User talk:BugEyedMonster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BugEyedMonster (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not Scorpionman so I shouldn't have to be blocked.

Decline reason:

You are Autoblocked for having the same IP as Scorpionman. Because of your similar user name and lack of previous edits from this account I will not clear the autoblock.--Konstable 20:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How about someone else, then? BugEyedMonster 14:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Scorpionman[edit]

I apologize for the delay in my response; I sometimes get busy with hospital work and am unable to edit. Your characterization is incorrect. A feud would imply that I feel hostility or anger towards Scorpionman, which I do not. On the contrary, I have spent a considerable amount of time trying to get him to modify the inappropriate behaviour, and you will not see me getting angry with him. Since he does not intend to call the police, I have restored the original block. I have made further comments on his talk page. — Knowledge Seeker 04:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's good. I'm sure that he'll at least be less hostile now. BugEyedMonster 15:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Human on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dionyseus 05:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages[edit]

I don’t know if you truly are Scorpionman’s brother or just an alternate account, but in any case, the same policies apply. Article talk pages are intended for discussion on how to improve the articles. They are not for debating the topic, and comments designed to inflame or stir up controversy are especially unacceptable. This comment was inappropriate. — Knowledge Seeker 05:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply an acquaintence of his. There's no need to be so accusing. BugEyedMonster 16:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from evolution talk page[edit]

You can continue this discussion here rather than diverting discussion about the evolution article.


POV Issue - I know it's painful but....

This was started by me, not BugEye and as it is still ongoing it is back at the Evolution article. If it needs to be moved, feel free to move it to my discussion page. standonbible 15:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]