User talk:Cicada44321
Cicada44321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your source of evidence which you use to conclude that I am affiliated with this sockpuppeter is unfair and ludicrous for a number for a reasons. First off, BilletsMauves claims that just because I am interested in Ukraine and its history automatically means that I am a sockpuppet account, which is not only absurd but also an insufficient source of evidence since there are millions of people like me who love to edit on articles relating to Ukraine. Also, "POV-pushing ways", what does that even mean? I didn't glorify those Soviet commanders because of their ethnicity, I glorified their achievements. For instance, for Andrey Yeryomenko, I stated that he was the mastermind in saving Stalingrad since he planned the successful defense of the city, and for Semyon Timoshenko, all I stated was that he was the man responsible for defeating the Finns during the Winter War. There is absolutely no glorification of their ethnic background within these edits. Their ethnicity is irrelevant. And as for Morozov and the tanks he designed (i.e. T-34 and T-64), I just simply found some sources explaining that he was an ethnic Ukrainian and wanted to put that there because I thought it would be helpful teaching somebody reading that page a new source of information which they did not know, but apparently in the mind of BilletsMauves, my interest in Ukrainian history is something only a sockpuppeter would like. The second source which Billets uses against me is that I "glorify" and "highlight" the "Ukrainian character" of successful people (all I do is just state their achievements, their ethnicity is completely irrelevant), and that I "deny" it for the more "vilified characters of the conflict". He then proceeds to use an edit I made regarding an article talking about the Ukrainian Insurgent Army in which I basically stated how Russian propagandists say that Ukraine is overrun by Neo-Nazis in order to justify their invasion, when the truth is that the OUN/UPA is only applauded by Ukrainians living in the west and is despised everywhere else. All I did here was fact-check Russian anti-Ukrainian propaganda which a significant amount of people believe. So just because somebody on Wikipedia supports Ukraine and fact-checks racist propaganda automatically makes them a sockpuppet account? Absolutely ridiculous. Finally, the last few sources which he uses to conclude that I am apparently a sockpuppet account is that sometimes when I edit a page, I type "final edit" when making an edit. I say this to inform others that I am simply finished with editing an article, and the fact that the sockpuppeter account also said "final edit" when making edits themself is completely coincidental and is an inadequate source of evidence which proves that I am an apparent sockpuppet account. He also states that this conflict happened not long after the last SPI case which was only about two weeks ago. If I am not mistaken, millions of people join Wikipedia everyday and according to BilletsMauves, if anyone likes to edit Ukrainian-related articles just a few weeks after a sockpuppeter had an SPI review which also liked to edit on Ukraine-related articles, that automatically makes them a suspected sockpuppet account, even if they had no idea that this sockpuppeter even existed in the first place. And third, he says that there is a clear source of evidence that I am a sockpuppet account on my talk page in which he states that I "have flatly provided excuses, only to put back some weird POV editing on the related articles". This is just untrue as for I am a genuinely new user on Wikipedia and I am still learning the rules. So to conclude, I feel extremely offended and hurt that you would use a shady source of evidence with several flaws that claims I am an apparent sockpuppet account and that somebody would even dare to affiliate me with such an awful person. The truth is that I love Wikipedia and its community and I want to make it a better website for everyone, not ruin it. I kindly ask you for this account to be unbanned as for it has been treated unfairly. If you do decide to unblock me, I will permanently stay away from Ukrainian-related articles as a result since you guys consider it controversial, even if I edit them in a helpful and educational context. Thank you for reading.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline. User has indicated they are retired, so aren't interested in editing further. Yamla (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.