User talk:Dannycali

Note: I'm in the process of handling this request, including contacting the blocking Administrator. Please have patience for the next few minutes. Anthøny 22:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, thank you. Dannycali 22:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannycali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

although I am basically inactive at this point, I noticed that someone banned me for being an alleged sockpuppet of JB196. I just wanted to say that is totally false. I do not use sockpuppets and I am not JB196, I don't know who that is, it is not me. I'd like to see any evidence that I am a sock of JB196, instead of one user making a bad/false accusation.

Decline reason:

Morven (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) appears to be offline at the moment, and as such I'm declining this request at this time. However, I intend to review the block fully, in light of Morven's reply to this comment at her talk page. If I don't do this within the next 24 hours, please email me with a reminder. Cheers, Anthøny 22:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.