User talk:Dastardly Duo

Guidelines for Us[edit]

Here you can chat with us, the Dastardly Duo. Not much else to say (so get off my fucking back). If you would like to post, please post in the current section with the month and year labeled above it. Or create a new section using the correct format. Though we screw with Wikipedia, we like to keep things organized. One more thing, please sign your posts. Thank you.

General Chat[edit]

October 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Banjo-Kazooie. Amortias (T)(C) 19:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

October 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dastardly Duo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for the way we behaved. We were just having a little fun. (Admin: Vandalism is not a form of fun! Us: Just realize that we're sorry and get off our backs.)

Decline reason:

That doesn't sound very sincere, esp. since it echoes y'all's first mission statement here. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a place for fun. Drmies (talk) 19:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dastardly Duo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seriously, man? Can you be any more sincere than sorry (no)? Besides, we can't exactly change the mission statement if we're blocked from editing our user page! Think about it. (And at least we were being honest.)

Decline reason:

Yes, seriously, "man". I thought about it, and no. (You've been editing this page all along, of course; time to put a stop to that as well. Drmies (talk) 20:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.