User talk:DuckieWorld

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Sulake do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 17:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Habbo Hotel. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Natalie 17:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Singapore. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your external links

The links you are currently adding do not meet WP:LINKS criteria for inclusion. Continuing to add such links is considered spamming regardless.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 18:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by spamming and inappropriate article creation. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. · j e r s y k o talk · 04:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DuckieWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I don't think the information added was spam.

Decline reason:

Even your signature qualifies as spam. See WP:SPAM. Additionally, you used a sock puppet to spam further (User:KevinIsABeast). — · j e r s y k o talk · 05:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.