User talk:Eeekster/Archives/2014/June

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hata entry

Dear Eeekster,

I revised the Hata page because it was extremely one sided and contained factual inaccuracies. The sections I deleted were extensive quotes from positive reviews of the professor's work. There have also been many criticisms of his work which were not quoted. In the interests of balance, I think it better to simply include factual information of the publications, rather than one-sided praise. I have added references to two important pieces of factual information which I included in the entry. These are also necessary to provide balance. I believe that the version of the entry as I have edited is fair and accurate. With thanks. From Giant Sumatra Rat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giant Sumatra Rat (talk • contribs) 01:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Edit

Dear Eeekster I edited the page on Simone Bienne because, as her lawyer parts were sorely inaccurate, including private details (incorrect) that is personal information. Thank you so much for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zz11765 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

As "her lawyer" you shouldn't be editing the page at all. Please read WP:COI. Eeekster (talk) 23:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)