User talk:Fanku

Thank you for experimenting with the page Sandbach School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sandahl 19:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sandbach School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Ksero 12:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Karl Clemens, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Macclesfield, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Macclesfield was changed by Fanku (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-14T13:47:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 13:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to The Wombats, you will be blocked from editing. Your tedious repetitive vandalism to this article, as well as others, is beyond a joke now. Stop, or be prevented from editing. DDStretch (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your a disgrace Dan stop making up silly stuff about the wombatsJim walker was here (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:The King of Clay may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. DDStretch (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guess Who

Yup!!!!Clay for the King (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:51OXJfOBSqL._SS500_.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:51OXJfOBSqL._SS500_.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:51OXJfOBSqL. SS500 .jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:51OXJfOBSqL. SS500 .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 14:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism on Sandbach which is the latest of a long list of vandalising edits stretching back for more than one year. Additional acts of vandalism will result in blocks rapidly increasing in length to prevent more disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. DDStretch (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]