User talk:Fellow-edit

--Fellow-edit 22:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Gullible on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. TigerShark 23:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Coulter[edit]

I'd be more than happy to. Thank you for reverting the vandalism to Bill O'Reilly controversies. I can definitely use your help and I hope I can be of service to you. Stanley011 23:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV on Ann Coulter's article.[edit]

Hi:

I'd like to introduce myself by stating that I am a libertarian with very strong conservative values/sympathies and I too see a lot of liberal bias on wikipedia. I consider myself a pretty big Ann Coulter fan and have worked with other editors to try and eliminate as much POV on her article as possible. That being said, I would like to ask you to please participate in a discussion on the Ann Coulter talk page of any POV you see in the article rather than simply reverting edits. I am very interested in hearing what you feel is POV about the links to Joseph McCarthy and Fox News because I don't see it at this point. Lawyer2b 03:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Fellow-edit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! MrMurph101 04:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 06:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill O'Reilly controversies (second nomination). --02:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

Talk:FrontPageMag.com#I_strongly_object_to_this_deletion up for deletion. Travb (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you target me? I dont understand. Travb (talk) 01:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fellow-edit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NOT a vandalism only account! I've never vandalized anything! I'm a long standing wikipedia conritbuter!----Fellow-edit 22:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'd say this edit and this would count as vandalism. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 22:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.