|Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.|
|This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at
|This is Fnlayson's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Fnlayson.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9|
Before posting, please read the notes below.
Links for possible use
Try to use: new delay for interim CH-148, A160 google search, Does Comanche.., C-17 last USAF orders, MMA Approved, Boeing lands MMA, P-8 on DID, 737 Goes to War, 737 AEW&C google search, Wedgetail contract FG search, Wedgetail contract, Dec. 1999, B-1 upgrades search. -Fnlayson (talk)
The Center Line: Winter 2015
|Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter|
|Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS|
- —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Fnlayson if you have a moment I like your input here, regarding the F-18B role "trainer"? or "combat aircraft"? We have sources with conflicting information - Many Thanks FOX 52 (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Boeing 787 Dreamliner battery problems
I notice you reverted my movement of the battery paragraph. I had done so because the batteries were no longer an ongoing problem (with the last incident occurring over a year ago, and all but one of them before the aircraft entering regular commercial service). No aircraft were more than minimally damaged. In the long-term scheme of things, this will be a minor developmental footnote. Pax 19:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Good point. The Lead or Intro should summarize the whole article. The text in the Lead can probably be shortened, at least. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Commercial Crew Development revision
Can you explain how "completed 13 of 18 its milestones." is proper grammar? What is the function of "its" in that sentence?
- As I said in my edit summary each company has separate milestone. What exactly is the problem with the wording? -Fnlayson (talk) 19:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
hello Fnlayson, I want to draw your attention towards HAL AMCA page, for the last one month or so one anonymous ip is editing the page with providing some citation to prove the claim but many claims still don't have any citation. looks like the editor has deep knowledge about the project and its inner workings (many an insider, not sure ) I thought an expert in aviation like you might be able to clear things out. happy editing ... bye :) Nicky mathew (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- No thanks. I have enough HAL products on my watchlist already. Try asking at WT:Air. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Move review for Carbon (fiber)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Carbon (fiber). Because you participated in the move discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the move review. Srnec (talk) 22:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)