User talk:Fnlayson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Unified login: Fnlayson is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.
Before posting, read the NOTES at top of page.
This is Fnlayson's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Fnlayson.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

NOTES[edit]

Links for possible use[edit]

Try to use: new delay for interim CH-148, A160 google search, Does Comanche.., C-17 last USAF orders, MMA Approved, Boeing lands MMA, P-8 on DID, 737 Goes to War, 737 AEW&C google search, Wedgetail contract FG search, Wedgetail contract, Dec. 1999, B-1 upgrades search. -Fnlayson (talk)

The Center Line: Spring 2014[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 7, Issue 2 • Spring 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of Imzadi1979

Barnstar[edit]

Eraser Barnstar Hires.png The Eraser Barnstar
{{{1}}}

Nicely done. Your edit to Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit solved the situation far more elegantly than my "citation needed" tag. As the man in the movie said, "why didn't I think of that?

Best regards

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 15:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)}}

Thanks. I had previously missed that text in the article. Glad you caught it. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

T-50IQ of the Iraqi Air Force[edit]

Hi Fnlayson,

According to KAI. What they are eventually delivering to Iraq are of the T-50 advanced trainer variety. Aside for the old press release article (https://www.koreaaero.com/english/product/fixedwing_t-50.asp) you can see KAI's current export information here (https://www.koreaaero.com/english/product/fixedwing_t-50.asp).

KAI is the better reference for this because they are the manufacturer. I'll be reverting your change.

Good day.

Israformales (talk) 22:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't believe that specific detail is in those sources. They only mention 'advanced trainer'. Advanced trainer and light attack is mentioned in the KAI press release about the contract. Other source states the FA-50 was bid to Iraq in the last year or so. Try to follow the notes at the top about using the article's talk page in the future. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Huntsville, Alabama: Out Of Control?[edit]

Did you notice the Facebook pages as references in the comedy section on the Huntsville page or my update to the talk page addressing that? Would you consider that out of control? Are you objective and impartial enough to look at that yourself?50.168.176.243 (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

I did, but I didn't feel it a critical issue. Facebook pages are not valid, reliable sources. You are welcome to remove the 'refs' per WP:IRS, if you want. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
I did mention that I'm biased, what with being a comedian and all. I feel it's best I don't touch it. I should just let someone objective do it. I shouldn't even have performed that minor correction.50.168.176.243 (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • There should be no issues if the edits are neutral. I removed the facebook 'refs' and tagged those entries needing refs. They are probably not significant/notable if reliable refs can not be found. -Fnlayson (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Thing is, it's hard for me to stay neutral on a subject of such importance to me... I recognise my limitations as a human and try to live accordingly. Thanks for handling that. I'll try to stay away from that page from now on. Out of sight, out of mind. Then, if someone is engaging in self promotion that could potentially benefit (or God forbid hurt) me, I don't have to feel compelled to find an unbiased person to look at it.50.168.176.243 (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk[edit]

Hello. I took the liberty to remove the notice you posted on Mouath14's talk page since I had already posted a custom message there, explaining why the edit was wrong. And since I obviously beat you to it by a split second when reverting the edit, I felt that it would be more appropriate if my message remained. Cheers. Thomas.W talk 15:30, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Ignore. Lots of edit conflicts today... Thomas.W talk 15:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I trimmed my warning down to a reply to your post right after that. That should be fine. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)