User talk:Fnlayson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Unified login: Fnlayson is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.
Before posting, read the NOTES at top of page.
This is Fnlayson's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Fnlayson.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

NOTES[edit]

Links for possible use[edit]

Try to use: new delay for interim CH-148, A160 google search, Does Comanche.., C-17 last USAF orders, MMA Approved, Boeing lands MMA, P-8 on DID, 737 Goes to War, 737 AEW&C google search, Wedgetail contract FG search, Wedgetail contract, Dec. 1999, B-1 upgrades search. -Fnlayson (talk)

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Spanish submarine G-7[edit]

You asked about the planned Spanish G-class of submarines in the merge discussion on this sub; it was mentioned briefly here (one of the sources for the G-7 page), but I've been unable to find anything else about it. Presumably they were to be built under licence, as the HA 1112 aircraft were, but that's just supposition on my part. Sorry I can't help more. Regards, Xyl 54 (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

That's alright. You can only go by what you have solid sources for. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Reversal?[edit]

removal of MV-22 orders is fine with me, just wanted to make sure thats what you really wanted - your previous thoughts - cheers FOX 52 (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

I guess I thought there was a deal/contract with Israel before. That was just a deal on the US side, and Israel has not signed yet according to media reports over the past few weeks. Sorry for any confusion. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
It's all good FOX 52 (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Boeing 777[edit]

Sorry about that, hit wrong link in error Face-sad.svg. Mjroots (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem and you fixed yourself. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Star Wars[edit]

Thanks for the revert. Yes I was too hasty in reverting all the edits. However that particular editor is a know disruptive editor, having already been blocked twice in the last year.Robynthehode (talk) 17:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Sukhoi Su-25[edit]

Can you keep an eye on this article. It has been the object of operatives that are trying to change the specifications page to bolster a completely spurious claim by Russia that a Ukrainian SU-25 was responsible for the downing of MH17. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I saw your revert of that this morning. Hopefully that was not the start of more uncited changes. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

777X seats[edit]

Concerning your edit summary: "No, the 18.0 inch wide seats are the narrowest, not widest" Sorry, but that is a) not supported by the source and b) doesn't seem to make sense. First, why would an aircraft manufacturer provide a minimum, thats up to the operating airlines and second even if, it clearly wouldn't be so high (common for current 777 at 10-abreast is about 17 inches and the 777X won't be that much wider to allow for 18 inches per seat without compromising aisle space). It will be the airlines choice wheter they actually want to do this, which is exactly what I wanted to point out by adding the "up to"-- SideshowBob7 (talk) 17:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

OK, fine. But either way your wording was not needed. The text simply says it can accompate 10 seats across with 18 in wide seats. Next time just use the article's talk as requested above. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)