User talk:Fnlayson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Unified login: Fnlayson is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.
Before posting, read the NOTES.
This is Fnlayson's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Fnlayson.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

NOTES[edit]

Links for possible use[edit]

Try to use: new delay for interim CH-148, A160 google search, Does Comanche.., C-17 last USAF orders, MMA Approved, Boeing lands MMA, P-8 on DID, 737 Goes to War, 737 AEW&C google search, Wedgetail contract FG search, Wedgetail contract, Dec. 1999, B-1 upgrades search. -Fnlayson (talk)

A-12 OXCART Codename[edit]

G'Day there, Any chance of weighing in on the new proposal I have on the A-12 talk page ? I'm going to slowly chip away slowly at the article and expand it here and there as time goes on, and add paragraphs when I can use a good reference or two, rather than just copy text over from the SR-71 article. It makes wikipedia look unprofessional (imho) and the editors lazy, so when I get the time I'll get the article following the time line but without cannabalising it just for the sake of article "volume". Cheers, Emir ☭ irongron ☭ (talk) 05:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about posting new things at the top, I'll read the banners from now on. Anyway, I've updated the article with all the losses, (including the 2 already covered) and added new major parts here and there in some semblance of chronological order and now I'm stuck as to what to add, if anything more needs to be covered. Do you have any suggestions as to what else needs to be done ? ☭ irongron ☭ (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  • No big deal on the post. Posts are more likely to be seen at the bottom also. I can't think of anything in particular. It would be good to replace the timeline, i.e. cover major events in text instead. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Some editor removed a whole bunch of text I had already cited out of pure spite towards me now the article is being vandalised. I found a really good reference for the SA-5 and it was reverted!!! And already cited text I had put in before I was blocked was removed from New Materials and production techniques. Is it right that an article be ruined and already cited text removed out of pure spite ? Anyway maybe you can fix it. It's just out of control now. It wrong, very wrong what's happened.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── No idea what all you are talking about. Please move discussion to the article's talk page (Talk:Lockheed A-12) as requested in Notes above. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:47, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Information[edit]

I think that you should be interested: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afmatpesr. Regards. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2)
17:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Not a big deal to me, but that's good to know people are checking on the user and possible socks. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)