|Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.|
|This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at
|This is Fnlayson's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Fnlayson.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9|
Before posting, read the notes below.
Links for possible use
Try to use: new delay for interim CH-148, A160 google search, Does Comanche.., C-17 last USAF orders, MMA Approved, Boeing lands MMA, P-8 on DID, 737 Goes to War, 737 AEW&C google search, Wedgetail contract FG search, Wedgetail contract, Dec. 1999, B-1 upgrades search. -Fnlayson (talk)
A-12 OXCART Codename
G'Day there, Any chance of weighing in on the new proposal I have on the A-12 talk page ? I'm going to slowly chip away slowly at the article and expand it here and there as time goes on, and add paragraphs when I can use a good reference or two, rather than just copy text over from the SR-71 article. It makes wikipedia look unprofessional (imho) and the editors lazy, so when I get the time I'll get the article following the time line but without cannabalising it just for the sake of article "volume". Cheers, Emir ☭ irongron ☭ (talk) 05:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry about posting new things at the top, I'll read the banners from now on. Anyway, I've updated the article with all the losses, (including the 2 already covered) and added new major parts here and there in some semblance of chronological order and now I'm stuck as to what to add, if anything more needs to be covered. Do you have any suggestions as to what else needs to be done ? ☭ irongron ☭ (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Some editor removed a whole bunch of text I had already cited out of pure spite towards me now the article is being vandalised. I found a really good reference for the SA-5 and it was reverted!!! And already cited text I had put in before I was blocked was removed from New Materials and production techniques. Is it right that an article be ruined and already cited text removed out of pure spite ? Anyway maybe you can fix it. It's just out of control now. It wrong, very wrong what's happened.