User talk:Fyodor Dos

Your edit to Freemasonry[edit]

If you're going to remove "not an occult system" from the introduction to the article as "not a factual statement", you're really going to need to support the removal of the statement on the talk page first. It's very bad faith to remove material from Wikipedia articles, but I think you already know that. This is your first and last AGF - next it's warnings and blocks. MSJapan 14:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it is "very bad faith to remove material from Wikipedia articles" then why do you continually do so? As requested I have provided the reference - The Wikopedia page for Occult, which states that that Esoteric and Occult are the same word!Fyodor Dos 01:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions[edit]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

If you are unwilling to provide sources or discuss edits....[edit]

Then you need to stop editing. You clearly have an idea in your head already, as you stated on the Talk:Freemasonry page, and you're trying to fit the article to your ideas. However, you have yet to actually answer any question put to you for references. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of fact, not a collection of personal opinions. For example, if you cannot support adding "occult society" to the article (which you obviously could not), you do not add it. If you cannot support adding "Sufism" to the "See Also", you do not add it. The burden of proof is on you, not those who revert your edits. MSJapan 15:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I remind you again of Wikipedia rules regarding uncivil comments and behaviour. In regard to personal opinions it would seem you did not go to the references I provided such as the catholic encylcopedia and Columbia encyclopedia. I also note you deleted another Editors requests for citations. I urge you to modify your behaviour, and quickly.Fyodor Dos 03:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 3RR violation on Freemasonry[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 15:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem, to have misunderstood the three-revert rule. As I understand it, it relates to more than three rv's of a given content, not more than 3 rv's on a given page. Fyodor Dos 03:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory0 96 03:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

????Please stop what editing?I was trying to provide citations as requested. How dare you accuse me of vandalism!!!Fyodor Dos

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Kirill Lok s hin 04:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I never violated 3rr rule, don't any of you Admins bother to read edits or familiarize yourself with meaning of 3rr? Two of the rv's were for edit errors and it clearly states in 3rr this is not counted towards total. What am I supposed to do? There is a group of Masonic editors who are ganging up preventing edits they dislike! All my edits are referenced and properly summarized. None of there's are? Do you Admins even care about obligations?Fyodor Dos 04:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings again[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Occult, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MSJapan 05:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Freemasonry, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MSJapan 05:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)\[reply]

I've reported you and User:Blueboar for 3rr violation. It is obvious that you are working together to combine your edits and circumbent 3rr rules.Fyodor Dos 06:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about...[edit]

...a nice cup of Shut The Fuck Up?

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

I've blocked you as a probable sock of User:Lightbringer William M. Connolley 13:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]