User talk:Generic69
Doright
[edit]Dear Generic69:
Yes, there is a history here. Over and over again, Doright has misquoted sources, given no citation or bad citations to authors, mangeled quotations, etc. In this case, he used the poem to attack fellow editors. If he did forget to cite, it is because he has a habit of doing so and has cost me a fair bit of time in trying to verify his quotes. Perhaps StanZegel's label of it as plagiarism is over the top, but it is not unreasonable to ask him to at least mention the attributed author of the poem. This all I did and then found myself under attack again and at length. I am hoping that Doright will now calm down a bit and try to work with us rather than simply screaming every time someone disagrees with him. --CTSWyneken 10:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well if there's stuff in articles that's not being cited then either citations need to be found or it should be removed. If someone quotes a famous poem as rhetoric on a talk page then que sera sera... Generic69 22:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
File:TNR-Georgia.png listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:TNR-Georgia.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
The article FairShare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG. This article reads like a personal essay and not an encyclopedia article. It just describes an idea someone came up with and a name for it, but does not cite any sources or provide reliable third-pary coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 06:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FairShare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Anton.bersh (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
The article Fairshare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)