User talk:Glasachin

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 04:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, I made the changes in order to remove the Indian Map you used on the site. The map is wrong as Kashmir part is not showing in Indian continent. Please, Use different Map. Thanks

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have written the reason for the editing and this time no content is distorted....please use correct map..

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 08:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have given reasons many times, Map of India is not correct......If you don't get it then ask from and Indian college who knows about Indian Map...

If you feel that there is an error in the content of the article, you may want to bring the issue up on the article's talk page -Aaron Booth (talk) 08:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I know some part of the article are incorrect then why are you not letting me to revert the changes...I have given the explanation for the edits.....

If you feel that details of the article are incorrect, either bring up the issue on the article's talk page, or correct the information and cite a reliable source for the change. -Aaron Booth (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi.... see the given link below for the map of India....

http://www.mapsofindia.com/

Your recent editing history at Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Aaron Booth (talk) 08:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit[edit]

In last you asked me to give the reference for the correct map of editing..... I have given that....even then you are not letting me to do the changes....are you not sure about your words...