User talk:Gmazeroff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Request for copyediting[edit]

Hi. Do you have the time to do a bit of copyediting on the article Insane Clown Posse? It's up as a featured article candidate and a lot of material has been added to the article since it was last copyedited. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 02:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, I'll do some copy editing. Look for some comments on the article's talk page.

Re:ICP revisions dated 31 July, 2008[edit]

I felt that the section didn't work. Some FAC reviewers might treat it as a sort of trivia section. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Nice work[edit]

Nice work editing the Brahms articles. Nice to see changes from one with an eye for details and references. --Blehfu (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Edit: The Texas Chain Saw Massacre[edit]

Hello, I am EclipseSSD. The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is a current FA candidate, and we would greatly appreciate if you could copy edit the article. If you can, give a shout. Thanks, --EclipseSSD (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing on Error detection and correction[edit]

First, thanks for your copy editing efforts on Error detection and correction!

In your latest revision, you slightly changed the meaning of the following statement:

However, ARQ requires the availability of a back channel, results in possibly increased latency due to retransmissions, requires the maintainance of buffers and timers for retransmissions, and has the potential to cause network congestion, which can put a strain on the server and overall network capacity.

The problem is that ARQ is not the (primary) cause of network congestion (though it can worsen it), but rather in the case of network congestion ARQ can put a strain on servers and networks due to increased overhead in buffer and timer management and retransmissions.

Maybe rephrase as follows?:

However, ARQ requires the availability of a back channel, results in possibly increased latency due to retransmissions, and requires the maintainance of buffers and timers for retransmissions, which in the case of network congestion can put a strain on the server and overall network capacity.

Cheers, Nageh (talk) 15:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion; I have updated the article. I plan to finish editing the remainder of the article this afternoon if you'd like to take another look at it. Gmazeroff (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Gmazeroff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]