User talk:Gowdramesh

Welcome!

nuisance editors[edit]

hi three / four people (or the same person using adjacent cabin computer?) (with user names similar to gaaaneshk, maaaximvsdecimvs, mmmmcm19 -user names altered to conceal their identity) think their view is A L W A Y S right, BUT NEVER HAVE THE GUTS TO SHOW VALID REFERENCES...but they delete VALID REFERENCED content from other users if it pricks their personal opinion...hope we monitor this cotery of lie mongerers ...hoping for your cooperation Ksense (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gowdramesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - KNM ^Talk 07:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deletion[edit]

Your article did not provide independent verifiable sources that it met the notability guidelines. It is also not neutral in tone. I note that you have recreated the deleted text, but I'll hold off deleting again for a while to give you a chance to provide independent sources for the notability of the topic. Jimfbleak.talk.14:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Karnataka Rakshana Vedike[edit]

On the contrary, my uninitiated friend, I have every right to revert your ridiculously gushy and propagandistic edits. Please do acquaint yourself with this Wikipedia policy before you start threatening people with statements like You better stop fooling around my posts. It would also be good if you read this and this. Read them for your own sake, because your present attitude will surely not win you any admirers on Wikipedia.

I won't revert your changes this time because I don't want stoop to petty edit wars with you but I will make sure that I get some second opinions about this article. - Max ^{- You were saying?} 05:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied to your challenge on the article's talk page here. Take a look. I assume that you must've read the Wikipedia policies I mentioned. I do see some slight positive changes in the article since I last left it. Good for you. - Max ^{- You were saying?} 16:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KRV logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KRV logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]