User talk:Grandmaster

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article.

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Azerbaijani: Qars, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Kurdish: Qers, Russian: Карс Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page.

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

re

I'm sorry, I've taken a sabbatical from all things Caucasus related. --Golbez (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I was tired of dealing with the crap by myself. All I could do was protect it, then protect it again when they restarted. I do an SSP, and it's discarded with prejudice. I didn't exactly ask for support from the wider admin community, which explains in part why I received none, but I guess I'm that kind of loner. Having people lie to my face and then be officially defended in SSP gave me a choice - I either start banning people based on my own personal guesses, or I withdraw. I withdrew. I would fully support any move towards dispute resolution and would testify that these articles are a shitstorm, but I need a break from them for a while. A long while. --Golbez (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Maybe if and when I decide to get involved again, I'll ask. And you can ask. But what I foresaw was another process of nothing happening. You are more than welcome to push it to the community, in fact I encourage it and would join on. But I have no interest in starting it myself. And, frankly, it's impossible that no other admin knows of the problems with the AA articles. So I didn't need to nor should I have had to ask. And when I did bring it to the bigger community, I was shot down. Maybe I'm a whiny bitch who left when he couldn't get his way, but I can live with that. --Golbez (talk) 22:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, I did plead to the community - when I left, I told WP:AN, and one person responded, though so far as I know no admin has actually been looking at the articles. --Golbez (talk) 22:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Warning on edit-warring and disruptive editing

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively and refuse to collaborate with others (e.g. your demeanor in the article Nagorno-Karabakh and Khojaly Massacre) may be blocked if they continue. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Winterbliss (talk) 04:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Last warning for removing content

Several warnings have been made. The issue of the "victims" has extensively and understandably been explained to you based on the context of the article.
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Khojaly Massacre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Aghetrichter (talk) 00:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC)