User talk:Jikolips

The AnimeLand[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The AnimeLand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Oli Filth 00:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The AnimeLand, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

third recreation of deleted article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NeilN 00:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction of unsourced articles[edit]

Greetings! I noticed you have created at least four articles recently, none of which provide sources to verify them. At least one of them has been the subject of repeated recreation. Accordingly, it calls into question your intent in creating these articles. If you have sources to back up the articles, please list them. Otherwise, I will conclude that the articles are disruptive and delete them. Thank you for your assistance. —C.Fred (talk) 01:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 22:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]