User talk:Jpgordon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

The Signpost
21 January 2015

For older history, check [1] as well as the archives.

Recent unblock decline[edit]

Does this remind you of anyone? OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Oy... ha, i hadn't read his most recent. I don't think I've ever been called a "catamite" before. At least, not as an insult. --jpgordon::==( o ) 02:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Or for that matter, a "cupbearer of Jupiter". He just called me Ganymede! How utterly...classical. --jpgordon::==( o ) 02:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Good stuff! My suspicion is that it's probably a trolling account... but then again, it could be sincere. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Merry[edit]

To you and yours

Weihnachtsschmuck.JPG

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


Frida Kahlo[edit]

How on earth can your edit be seen as racism? You are merely keeping the language neutral and therefore more appropriate for an encyclopedia. LynwoodF (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Beats me! --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Can too![edit]

I have the right to use BC/AD dates if I want. Our whole calender is based on the birth of christ like it or not so BC as in BEFORE CHRIST has always been used so why use some stupid new version? Wikipedia allows both versions but only BC/AD is correct in my eyes and I will continue to edit any wikipedia pages I come acrross that use BCE/CE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haweythetoon (talkcontribs) 17:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Nope. See WP:BCE; our manual of style overrides your particular preference. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive edits after recent block expiration[edit]

This guy --188.158.56.56 (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)