User talk:Kisida

Re: apologize[edit]

There's no need to apologize for editing something, that's what Wikipedia is all about! It looks like you were just editing in the wrong place, but you didn't really change anything, and it got fixed, so no harm done! No one seems to have welcomed you to Wikipedia yet, and that can help direct you to the right places, so here we go...

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Kisida, and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.

If you need help see:

Help contents - the main help page.
Quick guide - a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Good luck, and feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions! -- Nataly a 22:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Confluence[edit]

Glad to be here and will not take any chances in regards to editing at this time. Although I am experiencing some frustration in my research, because when I reach a dead end or stub, I sometimes know what connects and I only participate to forum a bridge. I want news, new news that contributes to the big picture within our human horizon. Egotistically man has entertained self to the point of hardening the elasticity of understanding. My wings (Brains) are not to entertain for idols but rather to focus on what matters. Thank you all for your patients.Kisida 14:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Merging[edit]

Hey Kisida, I'm not sure if you meant to leave that message on my userpage or not since you deleted it, but if you've got questions about merging, take a look at Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages, which should give you some guidance. -- Nataly a 20:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Natalya, After I first posted “Merging” Realized I need to read on, and did; now knowing how the answers can be right under my nose but cant see it till I at least attempted to reach out, tis could be a single parent thing or perhaps a constant refraction like Helen Keller: do I have to be deaf and blind to think clearly and see.Kisida 05:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point[edit]

First Amendment: Freedom of Speech

>If< Philosophy when restrained with limitations, resorts back to an opinion to the one who restrains. Philosophy dose not restrict to any certain expertise, it is the expertise eyes (mind) that looks holistically, and philosophically; that all possibilities may be contributors. Philosophy is the last stepping stone to bare witness-bearings awareness, to see with your own eyes. Medical Science confirms our brains are equipped to see everything coded in our DNA, where we come from-to our trajectory. One stump in Philosophy I see is the concept of sacrifice. Sacrifice is not killing animals; in an alternate sense (saving animals-walk gently) it is to sacrifice the good life (easy living) for the good life nature provided for us. <End if>

Scholar came before Academy

Higher intelligence level’s objective: holding back; from performance: constricted to conditioning, (fear of bucking the establishment). Institutionalized by inappropriate political order of seniority (maturity) Not to be idealistically inclined, rather holistically inclined by interior design, unique contributions.

talk page comment[edit]

Nothing Compares to Team work Talk:Robert McHenry