User talk:Kmisra
Image tagging for Image:Iker1.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Iker1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
sandbox[edit]
It is a good idea to start any new article in User:Kmisra/sandbox and only copy it into the (Main) namespace once it is "viable". I nearly deleted Flight 605 as "copy-n-paste vandalism" when I saw the first state of it! -- RHaworth 10:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Flight_605_crash.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Flight_605_crash.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD tag[edit]
Please stop removing the Article for Deletion tag at SkyWest Airlines flight 5741. This is considered vandalism.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 22:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Good article[edit]
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that you did a good job putting the Republic Airlines flight 4912 & SkyWest Airlines flight 5741 page together. Please DO NOT let the AfD process discourage you. The nominator was acting in good faith, but he nominated it ONE MINUTE after you started the page. He has been called on this, and I hope he will be more careful in the future. If you'd like to know how to start an article on a sandbox page first, let me know, and I'll be glad to explain it to you. This way, you can but a fully-formed article on the mainspace, and hopefully avoid over-eager nominations ofr deletion in the future. By the way, the article is most likely going to be kept, as of right now anyway. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation accident task force is fully behind it. You might want to take a look at that page, and consider joining the task force if you haven't already. Again, good job! - BillCJ 02:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've replied on my talk page. - BillCJ 05:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you addressed some of my concernes regarding uncited information in the Mike Gascoyne article, thanks! However, you must be careful that the articles and websites which you cite actually support the information stated in the Wikipedia text. For instance, you have cited this article as supporting "Mike Gascoyne's" instruction to put Winkelhock onto wet tyres. The article does not state this, it mere suggests that "Spyker Ferrari" did so. Now you may assume that Spyker = Gascoyne, but there is no evidence that this is so from that article, explicit links need to be made. The suggestion could well have come from someone lower in the team ranking. Similarly, the BBC article does not support the statement that Gascoyne and Toyota parted through "mutual agreement" (note the direct quotation... this needs to be verbatim, not just the gist). I have altered the working of the text to fit. You made a change to the speed improvement quote, so you are presumably aware of this issue, but you need to be a touch more careful in future! ;-) Pyrope 11:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Edit summaries[edit]
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Punkmorten (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gulu ezekiel, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://site.dukandar.com/authors/guluezekiel.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Kmisra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)