User talk:Matiassalord
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. [1] Peacock (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
September 2019[edit]
Hello, I'm Enivid. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IG Group have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Enivid (talk) 09:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tilottoma Bangla Group[edit]
Hello Matiassalord,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tilottoma Bangla Group for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
John B123 (talk) 22:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Tilottoma Bangla Group for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilottoma Bangla Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Celestina007 (talk) 22:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)