User talk:Naveen Kumar Reddy Bogireddy

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Naveen Kumar Reddy Bogireddy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zefr (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Naveen Kumar Reddy Bogireddy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Methylene blue, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You are populating various articles with your own publication, which seems off topic in most instances. Use independent WP:SCIRS reviews instead. Zefr (talk) 21:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear managing editor,

I am surprising that how you are deciding that the respective content is not suitable for corresponding citation?

Unfortunately i completely disagree with your decision.

As a expert in the field i dont have right to modify the data, it is not good sign.

Best regards Naveen Kumar Reddy Bogireddy (talk) 15:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In each article, you did not modify the content, but rather were populating your publication within individual articles, and across many topics. It seems you just wanted your publication to be present on Wikipedia as evidence of its acceptability. Further, your article appears to be primary research, not a review, which is the preferred source to use for an encyclopedia. It's better to not cite yourself, but - as an expert - you should know where reviews are published, and so should use them. Zefr (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]