User talk:NgPower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

UTRS[edit]

UTRS appeal #85510 has been closed, with an instruction to post any future unblock request here. JBW (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NgPower (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am writing to bring to your attention an issue I encountered upon logging into my account. Upon attempting to access my account, I discovered that it had been blocked, along with the associated IP address. The reason cited for this action is "professional spam/UPE network," yet there is no accompanying clarification provided. As an individual who values and actively contributes to the Wikipedia community, I am genuinely concerned about the accuracy of this accusation. I am a software engineer by profession, and I recently began dedicating my free time to contributing to Wikipedia. My intentions are rooted in a genuine desire to enhance the platform's informativeness and overall quality. Given the seriousness of the accusation and its potential impact on my ability to contribute, I kindly request that you provide me with detailed information regarding the alleged "professional spam/UPE network." It is crucial for me to understand the basis of this claim, as I am confident that I am not associated with any such network. I approach this matter in good faith and with a sincere commitment to upholding the standards and integrity of Wikipedia. Your prompt attention to this request will be highly appreciated, and I am hopeful that we can swiftly resolve this situation. NgPower (talk) 09:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even without access to the private checkuser data that supports this block, I believe that the block is correct just based on editing behavior. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NgPower (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that you may not be able to provide access to private checkuser data, I am eager to gain insights into the specific editing behavior that has led to this decision. Having a better understanding of the concerns related to my contributions will allow me to address any inadvertent issues and ensure that my future edits align with Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. Your detailed feedback on the observed editing behavior would be invaluable in resolving this matter, and I am open to making any necessary adjustments to adhere to Wikipedia's policies.NgPower (talk) 10:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, I won't give you the information needed to better avoid detection. And please don't use a bot to communicate with us. 331dot (talk) 10:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I am not using any bot or seeking information to avoid any kind of detection. I am coming in good faith to avoid such mistakes in future. The bot impression might be coming from my content as i am using chatgpt to deliver my messages in a better way and avoid any miscommunications. I am just trying to understand the reason which says i am related to a professional spam network. Because this is absolutely untrue and i am not related to such network. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated in this regard. Thank you. NgPower (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]