User talk:Novemberjazz/Archives/2023/October
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Aaron Hermes
When you created Aaron Harris (politician) did you mean Aaron Hermes? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- ↑ nudge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Shhhnotsoloud, It's not an obvious typo, but I wouldn't put it past myself to mess up a last name this badly. I support the redirect's deletion if that's the issue here. Novemberjazz 15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Shhhnotsoloud, It's not an obvious typo, but I wouldn't put it past myself to mess up a last name this badly. I support the redirect's deletion if that's the issue here. Novemberjazz 15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Harris (politician)
A tag has been placed on Aaron Harris (politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
It may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion under CSD G7
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
Sara E. Hill moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Sara E. Hill. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Decision per prior AFD that all nominees start as draft articles. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Snickers2686 (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Snickers2686: If you aren't already aware, someone else created the Sara E. Hill article. It looks better than my draft, but I'm not sure if it needs to be drafted too given the precedent that you mentioned. Novemberjazz 21:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate the heads up. I still think it should be draftified, but I'm going to leave it alone. I don't want to get into another situation of move, draftify, move, draftify, etc. like with what happened with the Jennifer Hall article. Snickers2686 (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Snickers2686: I took a couple weeks off, so I'm not up to date on the new precedent. I did see that a page I created, Draft:Kenechukwu Onyemaechi Okocha, was draftified. And a few other judicial nominee articles, created by you or me, got the same treatment. Novemberjazz 19:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not in favor of the new precedent, but have to abide by it. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tiffany_M._Cartwright
- There are also relatively new editors that have decided to gatekeep articles on Wikipedia, in other words, any nominees who were not confirmed from a previous administration (i.e. returned) now also get deleted because they don't meet WP:GNG or WP:JUDGE Snickers2686 (talk) 02:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh and just an FYI, MIAJudges was site banned via community consensus, but I have my suspicions that they may have created another account Snickers2686 (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Snickers2686: Thanks for letting me know all that! I'm not a fan of the precedent either, especially because I've been creating nominee articles (judges, ambassadors, other political appointees) for some time now. I know you are also very active in that subject area, so it's frustrating that we've been kneecapped in that way. Novemberjazz 03:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh and just an FYI, MIAJudges was site banned via community consensus, but I have my suspicions that they may have created another account Snickers2686 (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Snickers2686: I took a couple weeks off, so I'm not up to date on the new precedent. I did see that a page I created, Draft:Kenechukwu Onyemaechi Okocha, was draftified. And a few other judicial nominee articles, created by you or me, got the same treatment. Novemberjazz 19:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate the heads up. I still think it should be draftified, but I'm going to leave it alone. I don't want to get into another situation of move, draftify, move, draftify, etc. like with what happened with the Jennifer Hall article. Snickers2686 (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)