User talk:Ogata-Sensei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello,

I have proposed that Ogata no Saburo Keroyoshi, an article you created, be deleted because I don't think the article in its current state is suitable for Wikipedia. Specifically, the article contains a story and information related to the story, but there is no clear distinction between the parts. In addition, you have not provided references to back up the statements. Wikipedia requires that there be no original research—that is, statements of facts in an article must be backed up by independent sources, and not just come from your own knowledge. Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners may be a helpful explanation.

If you intend on improving the article so that it is in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, you can just remove the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice on the page and get to work, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Thank you for your work, and don't be discouraged—I didn't propose that the article be deleted because it is bad, but because it needs to be rewritten for Wikipedia. Good luck. wctaiwan (talk) 14:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ogata no Saburo Keroyoshi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ogata no Saburo Keroyoshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogata no Saburo Keroyoshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ╟─TreasuryTagduumvirate─╢ 11:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]