User talk:Piet Parkiet
Hello, thanks for adding links to disambiguation pages. If you look at MOS:DABRL, it'll show you how to add redlinks properly; at th moment, people might delete them. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Documenta 3) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Documenta 3, Piet Parkiet!
Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
I wanted to bring up something else that comes up at page review a lot; it's your use of tables. I've seen all the work you've been putting into the Documenta articles, and thank you for all that work, but I don't think tables are a good way to display the information; they're hard to edit, and for users with accessibility issues, hard to read. If you want to present a list in columns, try using the Template:Columns-list They emit correct html. Here's an example:
B
C
D
F
G
H
I
K
L
M
O
P
S
T
V
V
Looks a lot like how categories are rendered, doesn't it?
Mduvekot (talk) 02:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Documenta 6) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Documenta 6, Piet Parkiet!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Piet Parkiet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Piet Parkiet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Documenta 15 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:TOOSOON
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daiyusha (talk) 10:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Documenta 15 moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Documenta 15, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Piet Parkiet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Documenta 15.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)