User talk:Richmassena

Speedy deletion of Goodnight, Armstrong County, Texas

A tag has been placed on Goodnight, Armstrong County, Texas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 19:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

The town is of some significance to Texas panhandle history. It's namesake is a truly significant figure in Texas panhandle history. I was hoping that others with a similar interest would add more content, but I see that hasn't happened. I didn't want to crib directly from The Handbook of Texas as the sole source.

Richmassena (talk) 03:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Comparative table of diaphragm numbers.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Comparative table of diaphragm numbers.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I drew this diagram based on the jpg file that had been uploaded with the same chart. When clicking on the chart, these are the comments on the image source: "Blatant borrowing of David Stein's scan of an 1899 article. Photo Miniature, Vol. 1 No. 1, New York, April 1899"

My reason for uploading a re-implementation of the chart was to clean up the JPG artifacts and produce a more attractive version of the same information.

Aside from the formatting, the listed information is a simple aggregation of facts.

Richmassena (talk) 02:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Catesby Oklahoma Church.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shattuckokwindmills.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shattuckokwindmills.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Elliscountycourthouse.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elliscountycourthouse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ralls Texas Welcome.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ralls Texas Welcome.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Catesby Oklahoma Church.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Catesby Oklahoma Church.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vahurzpu (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)