User talk:SNIyer12/Archive12

George Kalinsky[edit]

Just wanted to drop a note regarding George Kalinsky's page. If I'm not mistaken, the reference you make to his web site saying he's the Mets' official photographer is from the article "Elvis Is on the Building" which is the lead on his News page (http://georgekalinsky.com/news/index.html). However, the article's intention was to say that he's "created some of the most celebrated images of famous people" during his time as official photographer for MSG, RCMH, and the Mets. It doesn't say that he is the current official photographer for the Mets. If you go to Page 4 of the bio on his site (http://georgekalinsky.com/biography/index4.html), you will see it correctly lists only MSG and RCMH. I hope this clears things up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.243.156 (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Team season links[edit]

Stop linking team seasons to plain years, as you did at Mets-Phillies rivalry. This is poor practice per WP:EGG and a consensus exists against links of this type. — KV5 • Talk • 00:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mets-Phillies rivalry[edit]

Please follow the tense used in the article; past events should be written about in the past tense (for example, McGraw expressed remorse, not " McGraw would express remorse"). Also, please see WP:NOTBROKEN, and do not fix links to redirects that are not broken. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 14:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your changes to Mets-Phillies rivalry. "Moments of peace" should not be its own section. Each "moment", with references, should be incorporated into the article's chronology. I do not want to have to go back and fix all of this. Please make the appropriate changes. — KV5 • Talk • 16:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use euphemisms like "passed away" for dying, per the linked policy. — KV5 • Talk • 14:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use informal language in the above article, like "Shea" for Shea Stadium, as well as contractions. Please correct those additions that you made. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 17:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Use en-dashes for box scores (like 5–4 instead of 5-4). This includes in page and article titles. — KV5 • Talk • 18:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know, you don't have to note everything that you aren't putting in the article on the talk page. Just discuss major changes before you make them. As is, the talk page is getting cluttered. I'll archive it, but just so you're aware... — KV5 • Talk • 19:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SNIyer12. You have new messages at Killervogel5's talk page.
Message added 19:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Curse of the Bambino[edit]

Once again, please stop pushing "the field where the Curse of the Bambino died" into various articles. It seems like you're giving undue weight to the stadium's importance in the event (or of the event to the history of the stadium), AND you're tendentiously editing it to boot. If you continue this, I will ask for a topic ban to be imposed on your regarding this topic. umrguy 42 04:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, stop adding "the field where the Curse of the Bambino died". --Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance[edit]

Please be mindful of the relevance of your edits to the subjects of the articles you're editing. The info about Colletti's reasoning for choosing Mattingly isn't relevant to the Yankees. Likewise, how long it's been since Philadelphia won a title isn't relevant to the Rays. --Muboshgu (talk) 16:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Stanley Cup Finals Local Broadcasters[edit]

Template:Stanley Cup Finals Local Broadcasters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Reso lute 17:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of the St. Louis Cardinals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You've been warned about inflating the importance of the "Curse of the Bambino" to the Cardinals. Muboshgu (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Halladay's perfect game[edit]

This is a courtesy notice to let you know that I have nominated Roy Halladay's perfect game for deletion. If you are interested in participating in the discussion, click the link above. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 17:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2004 World Series[edit]

You've been making a few edits to this article over the last week or so, that's fine of course but I've noticed four references seem to have been lost somewhere in those edits. Was this intended? BUC (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you can, could you keep a close eye on 2004 World Series tomorrow for me? It's going to be on the main page. Thanks in advance. BUC (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, SNIyer12. You have new messages at Killervogel5's talk page.
Message added 20:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ParliamentHill911Memorial.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ParliamentHill911Memorial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije 16:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

2009 World Series[edit]

Talk of presidential coincidences and a Philadelphia championship drought when the Phillies won the World Series in 2008 do not belong in this article. --Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yankees-Mets rivalry[edit]

Please do not take out sections from the article as you did without discussion. It's just proper courtesy. Thanks. Arnabdas (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yankees-Red Sox rivalry[edit]

Please refrain from making SWEEPING changes like you did. You gutted the entire article. The discussion was to remove parts of it, not to take out all of that information entirely. Much of that is very relevant to the article. From now on, as a friendly request, please discuss before making a change on that scale that would totally turn it into something different. Arnabdas (talk) 18:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of key moments in the Yankees – Red Sox rivalry for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of key moments in the Yankees – Red Sox rivalry, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of key moments in the Yankees – Red Sox rivalry until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Muboshgu (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canucks–Flames rivalry[edit]

The article Canucks–Flames rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run of the mill divisional rivalry. Hardly more notable than any other

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reso lute 22:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]