User talk:Sajjangad

Welcome!

Hello, Sajjangad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Prashant Balkrishna Kulkarni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ClubOranje^T 08:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prashant Balkrishna Kulkarni[edit]

A tag has been placed on Prashant Balkrishna Kulkarni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ClubOranje^T 08:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —SpacemanSpiff 09:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Meditation, you may be blocked from editing. Sudo Ghost 05:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—slakr^\ talk / 05:57, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sajjangad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

as user slkar has siad that I am posting spam links and has given example of Meditation page....But let me tell you that I ama not a spammer.I am not the owner of website as well...I just found that the particular website I was mentioning is the only website available on web containing ALL the literature of Samarth Ramdas and hence I had given pointers to it in external links...I gave pointer to that site in meditation section as the book explains in detail how to meditate and it is available on that site in 8 languages including ENGLISH. by removing the links we will be seriously making readers miss something very relevant to that topic. Please restore all the links. I am not spamming with those links, and that site is not a profit making org. thanks

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't care if you or the site would make a profit. If you're adding links to several different pages that serve no apparent purpose other than to increase web traffic to a page, then you are spamming. Domains that get spammed repeatedly end up on our spam blacklist, preventing them from being added again. Wikipedia is not your sandwich-board. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sajjangad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make sure that such things can be considered as spamming on wikipedia and hence forth try not putting links but will keep on adding good information in order to enrich the database of our wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Declined due to lack of response to the question below. Max Semenik (talk) 11:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Considering that your account was used for the purpose of spamming Wikipedia despite warnings to cease doing so, what edits would you make if you were to be unblocked? →B music ian 00:05, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]