User talk:Sergey Romanov

Holocaust Research Team

Hello! Recently the deletion explanation here was that HRT requested it, now it was changed. Do you know why?

--Sergey Romanov 16:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean by "it was changed". What was changed? First I deleted the userpage as it was blatant spam, but since then I have had private communication with the user and he/she would like it deleted. —Mets501 (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, will you please change your signature to include a link to either your user page or talk page page, and remove the external link? Thank you. (This is per Wikipedia's signature policy.) —Mets501 (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"What was changed?"

Now it says: "20:02, 19 November 2006 Mets501 (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Holocaust Research Team" (Blatant advertising)"

Earlier it said something like "I talked with this user, he has a right to vanish". These words are no longer there. (Thanks for the sig tip.) --Sergey Romanov 19:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you were looking at the talk page deletion log? —Mets501 (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It is clear now. BTW, I can't edit your talk page because it contains HRT URL, which is blacklisted. --Sergey Romanov 17:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deathcamps to Death-camps

What's the difference between these two sites? They're not owned by the same person, so which one is the legitimate owner and which one is the copy? Deathcamps.org was created in 2002, while Death-camps.org was created in 2006, so I'm guessing that the first one is the original owner. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-03-16 13:08Z

Can you explain to me exactly what content is different between these 2 sites? — BRIAN0918 • 2007-03-16 13:27Z

User:ARC-deathcamps.org

I thought you might want to know about this. Someone has registered this account and is undoing all your edits. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-03-21 12:43Z

License tagging for Image:Archived.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Archived.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

This User "Sergey Romanov" is in violation of www.deathcamps.org copyright

He has violated all of Wikipedia rules and regulations and all relevant parties have been notified. To include: Google Lega Department, Blogger Legal Department, WikiMedia, and the FBI.

Any admin who reverts www.deathcamps.org links to www.death-camps.org is in collusion with this user. A log file has been created and submitted to Wikimedia for review. Along with WHOIS and legally registered copyright information for www.deathcamps.org in both the USA & EU.

(unsigned message from 141.157.161.15)

Can I help? What is going on here? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theresa. 141.157.161.15 is vandalizing pages. You can check out my user page for back story. Thanks. --Sergey Romanov 19:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is this talk about copyright violations? Do we have any copyvios? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need a link to either site? I think we should just remove all links and reference the original sources instead. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nobody complained about the material itself (i.e. the content). The primary sources aren't easy to come by. --Sergey Romanov 19:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone from that IP alleges that death-camps.org site is in violation of copyright, and therefore insists on deleting my pages, since I insert this URL instead of deprecated deathcamps.org (see the user page for the whole explanation). Actually, it is deathcamps.org which is currently violating the copyrights. Knowing this person, he won't stop the vandalism. --Sergey Romanov 19:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I've kicked this discussion over to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal threats, counterfeit websites, oh my! for a wider hearing. I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out what's going on. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== We would like Sergey Romanov to prove his statements that www.deathcamps.org is violating any copyright? www.deathcamps.org domain name and text/materials are copyrighted in both the US and EU, ICANN registration and WHOIS.net prove the domain registration date for deathcamps.org as 2002 as opposed to 2006 for the fake version with the hyphen.

Other than anecdotal blog statements can Sergey Romanov offer any Legal proof to back up this claim? If so our attorneys would like to see it.

-The Genuine ARC Team

The above was left by "ARC-deathcamps.org". There is no "Genuine ARC Team" since there is no longer an ARC Team. I.e. the user lies. WHOIS doesn't prove anything about copyrights.

deathcamps.org contrains John Ulrich Poulsen's site against his own wishes. He is a copyright holder, so deathcamps.org owner is in violation of his copyright.--Sergey Romanov 20:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Archived.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Archived.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 22:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless this image is to be used in an article, it qualifies for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#I5. I've tagged it as such. If you want it for a record, you may wish to save it onto your desktop; but it cannot be saved on Wikipedia. --Iamunknown 22:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. --Sergey Romanov 22:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Warning Do not vandalise pages by leaving your own point of views on them, as you did here to Uri Nation. This is considered vandalism and if you do believe the article should be deleted please leave an entry on WP:AFD thank you. Alphablast 13:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! --Sergey Romanov 14:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DobrokhotovFireExperiment.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DobrokhotovFireExperiment.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 00:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaim Rumkowski

I encourage you to participate in resolution of the current dispute on the following page Talk:Chaim_Rumkowski#Current_dispute

Cautious (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]