User talk:Sergiofly

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sergiofly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Social seating[edit]

Per your question I removed your additions to Social seating because they seemed to be a 3 paragraph advertisement for Satisfly.com. "useful" is actually not the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia, its verifiability, and wording such as "most notably" needs reliable sourcing. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:25, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that to you, the three airline cases seemed to be advertisement. Wasn't my content verifiable by the news articles referenced?

The wording "most notably" was previously added by other contributors and had been there for some time. And by the way, having Satisfly pioneered social seating in 2008 and pushed the boundaries of airlines digital products ever since, it is an appropriate wording, just like Daimler with Pagani.

I actually would like to contribute with even more relevant, verifiable and neutral content about airline social seating cases. So how shall I do this?

Sergiofly (talk) 07:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You actually "do this" by not doing this since your intent seems to be promotional (forgive me if I have the wrong impression). The policies on Wikipedia and promotion are at WP:NOTPROMOTION. You can improve the article by looking at reliable sources on the subject and expanding, severally truncating, or maybe even deleting the article based on that. Making a claim that Satisfly is 3/4 of the social seating phenomenon may be true but I sure didn't see that in the references. If this is mostly a creation of Satisfly then this article should be deleted and a Satisfly article should be created with this as a listed product.

These are just some suggestions on my part (I am not an administrator or anything). Feel free to seek advice from other wikipedians or look through the guidelines Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I provided neutral and verifiable content for the sole purpose of enriching Wikipedia with relevant and accurate information. I confirm that you had the wrong impression and kindly as you to execute a thorough research based on facts rather than subjective impressions. The content that I provided can only benefit spectators who are researching about social seating, hence its deletion is a loss for Wikipedia. Sergiofly (talk) 01:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits again. Adding external links to a company in the body of an article and making claims about a company without sufficient sourcing is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please note that editing on Wikipedia to solely to promote a singe company can cause you to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please keep that in mind. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 12:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]