User talk:The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Welcome!

Hello, The Black Rabbit of Inlé, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Testing[edit]

Again... — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_(Werds)

Steady on[edit]

You're coming dangerously close to personal attacks. While I don't disagree with anything you say, I don't think that article talk pages are the appropriate place. TheresaWilson (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right. Sorry. I'll stop.

(That said, I find myself wondering exactly what the appropriate place might be...) — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(WikiProject:Ed? ^_^)} 16:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RW? TheresaWilson (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm. Bit too humany for me. Is there a wiki that caters to people with an unhealthy fondness for marmalade? — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(It would be called MarmaWiki, and it would probably be very sticky.)} 04:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not 1/2 as humany as it used to was. A marmalade appreciation wiki could be arranged. TheresaWilson (talk) 04:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's incredibly humany. I'm sticking to marmalade. (Long wait: forgot about WP. Sadness) — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Marmalade is not an entry drug)} 22:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, "used to was" is an amazing construction and I look forward to using it quite gratuitously in the future. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(I am glad to have done business with you *bows*)} 00:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby licence you to use the copyright ^{©2009 Theresa Wilson} word construction heretofore mentioned. ^{Within limits as described in the Court of International Justice at the Hague.} TheresaWilson (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:(

Halp. Not gud at legal language. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Is hard)} 03:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hee! Nor am I. TheresaWilson (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I will confer with my canon lawyer. We will see you in ~~caught~~ court. Good day. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(You need a black umbrella to say that line right)} 04:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What have you gotten yourself into now? --Lanfranc (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC) <- I do, in fact, own a black umbrella.[reply]

Halp, Theresa is being mean and confusing me with Language. :( — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(YOU MUST GIVE ME YOUR BLACK UMBRELLA)} 12:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wabbit, never let it be said that I, at any time, deliberately attempted to confuse such an expert at confusion as your goodself using language. TheresaWilson (talk) 15:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kana[edit]

I am (re)learning kana, using a Memorizer program I wrote. Your name is Ra Bi Tto, right? --Uncle Ed (talk) 14:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's right... to the best of my knowledge ^_^. It's just supposed to be "rabbit", though -- as you can see from the above section. "Wabbit" was also considered. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(We do need more wabbits.)} 04:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What did you do to attract Ed Poor's attention?

Radioactive afikomen`

Heh! See Talk:Religious exclusivism‎. TheresaWilson (talk) 11:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also put a notification template on his page. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(That was alright, right?)} 12:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hai[edit]

Sorry I haven't been in touch, but your mail account thinks I'm sending spam mails again, so apparently none of the approximately 100 mails I've sent have gotten through.

Anyway, I suddenly got very busy with the essays - the deadline's tomorrow (oy vey!), unless I suffer a total breakdown before then and flee the realm in total humiliation, abandoning my pretentions to historian-ship for an exciting new career as a fur trader in Outer Siberia. (These things happen more often than you'd think.) --Lanfranc (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hai. I have replied to your last mail, and am taking steps to resolve the problem.

Your deadline is today, then? How did it go?</concern>

By the way, it took ages to post this, because WP keeps "losing session data", so if you're trying to post here and you can't because of the same problem, try ringing me up at aSK. (This internet communication thing is becoming increasingly absurd) — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(*hides in burrow*)} 16:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See you've gone over to the dark side.[edit]

TheresaWilson (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See you're still pursuing your Quixotic-Manichaean crusade against "godbothering". How's that working out for you? --Lanfranc (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woss wrong with being Manichaean? — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Being Quixotic is quite fun too)} 15:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're addressing me, AK, you'll note that I did apologise for the "Bronze age" bit. ;-) TheresaWilson (talk) 18:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you well should, since they were at least transitional period, if not full iron age. --Lanfranc (talk) 21:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if they'd been of the electronic age, I'd say much the same. Teh stoopid omnipotence etc thing gets me. How pointless to speak of the powers of a mythical being. But I's blocked so can't contribute. TheresaWilson (talk) 23:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but even if there is some debate over the "mythical or not" question, is it not exactly the little pointless things that make life interesting? Would it not be horribly boring without pointlessness? --Lanfranc (talk) 23:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All right, settle down. We've all have a good laugh.
Now then. Dark side? Sounds about right. aSK is good for long, rambling debates, which is good for wabbits. Full of vitamins and iron. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Rabbits like to debate things)} 15:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enormous jellyfish[edit]

Just thought you'd be interested. Totnesmartin (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a time when I could sleep in the middle of a field without some comedian drawing around me. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Enormous jellyfishen for the win! ^_^)} 15:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]