User talk:Throbbing Stallion

Welcome!

Hello, Throbbing Stallion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ben Stork, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ben Stork

A tag has been placed on Ben Stork requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 01:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Acroterion. Marek.69 ^talk 01:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Fabrictramp

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Throbbing Stallion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

responding to comments below. You aren't very specific. It does not appear you understand why what you did was wrong, nor does it seem to indicate what you mean by constructive. Could you perhaps convince us of your assertion that you intend to behave? Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am sorry for the bad conduct. I promise to make constructive contributions in the future, as I rely on Wikipedia for my own information purposes. I am very, very sorry. Throbbing Stallion (talk) 01:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Wikipedia is not a playground. Talk pages are for working on the improvemnt of article content. Your edits similar to those in Talk:Sales lead are disruption of wikipedia. One more frolicking anywhere in wikipedia, and the account will be blocked again. - 7-bubёn >t 02:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndon LaRouche

Hey. I noticed that you added Lyndon LaRouche as a potential candidate to United States presidential election, 2012, with this as a reference. That link redirects me here, but I can't find any reference to Lyndon LaRouche except in the comments section. The views of people who comment on articles published by reliable sources aren't reliable in themselves, so I hope you don't mind that I've reverted your edit. However, if I've missed a reference to LaRouche as a potential candidate in that article, or if you are aware of any reliable source referring to him as a potential candidate, feel free to explain here and restore him. Thanks. — Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 23:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Checkuser evidence has shown that you are the same person as User:Cognition, who has been banned since 2006. As a result, you have been blocked indefinitely. If you wish to appeal this block, please email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]