User talk:Trollmage
Mike, Sometimes fiction is based loosely or closely on past historical events, in which case the "real-world interpretation" of a fictional event would be its factual historical counterpart. However, at the time of writing, the fictional "Day of Lavos" was a future event, not a past historical event. And the storyline was pure fiction, not any kind of prophecy. Also seeing any kind of correspondence between a space alien annihilating the planet and someone calling a press conference is very much a matter of highly subjective interpretation, and that's not encyclopedic content. See Wikipedia:No original research and also Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. -- Curps 04:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --TheKoG 17:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)