User talk:Zoe17
Welcome[edit]
Welcome To Wikipedia! Hello, Zoe17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the project and decide to stay and make constructive edits. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- My Talk Page (A Page That You Can Contact Me On)
I hope you enjoy editing here and have a great time being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page, I will always be willing to help you on Wikipeia so you can ask your questions on my talk page and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Again, welcome and I hope to see you editing again! ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 22:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
American naturopath[edit]
A tag has been placed on Richard Shulze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Richard Shulze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. The previous discussion was at WP:Articles for deletion/Richard Schulze (naturopath). JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello. You included a sentence on Bertrand's postulate to this article. However, this material was already present elsewhere in the article prior to your edit. Please could you be more careful in future? Many thanks, Mathsci (talk) 22:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
sandbox[edit]
you have no right to do that because Wikipedia is not censored i am putting it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.220.127 (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Drainage basin[edit]
Hello - I hope you don't feel that I am overly scrutinizing your edits , but some of the terminology and sentence structure you've used in the drainage basin article required editing to meet wikipedia standards. Cheers Halogenated (talk) 14:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)