Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Fluxbot 401

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

Fluxbot 401[edit]

Operator: Xaosflux (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 03:08, Friday, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:

Programming language(s): obfusticated C

Source code available: You'll never understand it

Function overview: Will randomly add easter eggs to articles in the form of html comments.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): This will give people a reason to look at the wikitext!

Edit period(s): Once per year, during the first day of the fourth month.

Estimated number of pages affected: 1-100/run

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Nope

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: The summary about says it all, please speedily approve!

Discussion[edit]

A bot of this type would probably be better off if written in an esoteric programming language. Perhaps LOLCODE or Brainfuck? Kharkiv07 (T) 03:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please please please write it in Logo! – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95 For your experiments: Logo — xaosflux ^Talk 10:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, poor socket control is preventing Logo - perhaps I could wrap a screen-reader around the core Logo utilities? Anyone have experience with this? — xaosflux ^Talk 10:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by operator. Didn't get approved and this task won't be useful for another year. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.