Wikipedia:Featured article review/Macfarlane Burnet/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC) [1].

---

Macfarlane Burnet

Notified: Peta/PDH, YellowMonkey, WP History of Science, WP Bio, WP Australia, WP Med, WP Viruses, WP Physiology, talk page notification 2021-12-20

Review section

This 2006 has not been maintained to FA standards. The issues listed on talk on 2021-12-20 include datedness, comprehensiveness, an overreliance on non-independent sources, prose and MOS issues. The article appears to be unwatched, and needs a tune up to retain status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

• Move to FARC, nothing really happening since Sandy's improvements back in December. Hog Farm _Talk 16:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Move to FARC, no improvements, appears no one cares. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
• Move to FARC after an independent examination, I agree with most of the criticisms. (t · c) buidhe 07:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, prose, and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Delist no progress (t · c) buidhe 19:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delist no engagement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delist per Sandy, as nothing has happened here to improve the article. Hog Farm _Talk 15:56, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.