Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Leader of the Workers' Party of Korea/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Leader of the Workers' Party of Korea[edit]
Leader of the Workers' Party of Korea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because its the greatest party on earth as the DPRK media puts it.
More seriously, it was very easy to make a leader list for this disgusting party (if you can even call it that)... However, the list is not important in itself since positions don't mean anything in Korea; the only thing that matters is if you're a Kim or not. TIAYN (talk) 18:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - unfortunately I think this is a 3b failure. The list only contains four items and I think it could be reasonably incorporated into the article on the party -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: It contains 10 items. 5 offices, 4 four leaders and a leader designation. --TIAYN (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - those are generic, borderline non-reasons for nomination that could apply to any list. Also why you would nominate a list for (by your own admission) a disgusting party is just baffling. Wingwraith (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. I'd suggest this be a quick failure. As noted, 3b. It is, fundamentally, a list of four people, all of whom are covered better and with more context in the parent article, as is the inside-baseball of the lead position's name changes. The only thing this list brings to the table is a tabular format. That aside, the references are also a mire of template errors sufficient to be problem also. This isn't one of the project's best lists, but I suspect the nominator already knows that and is trying to make some manner of point here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination doesn't seem like it's going to come back from the initial response, so closing. --PresN 19:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.