Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)/1

Article was delisted

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted after several months without any "keep" votes and how there are still glaring issues with inadequately covering the major aspects to meet GA criterion 3a. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As this thread demonstrates, this is not up to GA standard. Two of the most important sections are below-standard, and consideable work is needed. This is one of thre dowsides with drive-by nominations - the nominator for GA made no edits prior to nomination and only five afterwards, which is just not enough. - SchroCat (talk) 19:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, completely agree. This film was pretty big when it came out, and I fully believe you could write at least four or five lengthy paragraphs simply about the production, not to mention what critics thought. This might be a bit hypocritical, since I have no intent in working on this article, but I really do think the nominator could have done much more. It's a good start, and I wish the best of luck to anyone working on this, but it definitely needs more for GA status. Famous Hobo (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Agree with Famous Hobo. Production section needs major expansion and the critical response section is quite weak for such a large release. Many of the other sections also seem incomplete. - Brojam (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per WP:Quickfail #3 (would have needed a tag when nominated) and WP:GA? #3a. I was annoyed to see someone added tags to a recently listed GA, then chagrined to see the tags weren't unjustified. With a film such as this, I would suggest something more could be said about the special effects than 10 words: "Framestore in London produced the visual effects for the film". Ribbet32 (talk) 05:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.