Wikipedia:Peer review/Morgan Freeman on screen and stage/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Morgan Freeman on screen and stage[edit]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because Morgan Freeman has a long, extensive career history that is still being added to. He's also one of my fav actors and deserves to have a great career history. Any suggestions would be helpful!

Thanks, LADY LOTUSTALK 20:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from SNUGGUMS

Going for another FL? I did a bit of copyediting to the lead, and am happy to give this some preliminary comments.....

Yes ;) Probably my last one for a while, just felt nice to get articles to FL status. Thanks Snuggums LADY LOTUSTALK 11:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "before being cast in the 1989 war film Glory as Sgt. Maj. John Rawlins"..... not sure the prefixes should be abbreviated if included
    •  Done
  • "he played God in the comedy film Bruce Almighty opposite Jim Carrey and again in the sequel Evan Almighty"..... if mentioning Carrey for Bruce Almighty, then Steve Carell should be mentioned for Even Almighty; in its current form, this could suggest Carrey was in Evan Almighty when in fact he wasn't.
    •  Done
  • "During that time he also"..... needs comma after "time"
    •  Done
  • "he played Eddie 'Scrap Iron' Dupris in Clint Eastwood's film Million Dollar Baby, which he won an Academy Award"
  • "The following year he was in"..... needs comma after "year"
    •  Done
  • FN20: Time shouldn't be in all caps
    •  Done
  • FN21: Should read The Baltimore Sun
    •  Done
  • FN34: Michael Fleming Jr → Michael Fleming, Jr.
    •  Done
  • FN36: reliable?
    •  Done - replaced
  • FN37: Same as FN20
    •  Done if you meant that Time doesn't need to be caps
      • Yes
  • FN's 38 and 39: reliable?
    • 38 is The New York Times? and FN 39 replaced.

LOL it's ok! LADY LOTUSTALK 20:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through again, I meant to say FN40 (Crave Online) Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, as far as I can tell CraveOnline is reliable. Nothing about it says it's gossip or heresay. LADY LOTUSTALK 11:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • FN44: Same as FN36
    •  Done - replaced
  • FN's 46 and 47: Should read TheWrap
    •  Done
  • FN57: USA Today should be italicized
    •  Done
  • FN56: Since publishers aren't being used in other refs, I'd say remove "Hearst Newspapers" for consistency
    •  Done
  • FN70: reliable?
    •  Done - replaced
  • FN71: Same as FN's 46 and 47
    •  Done
  • FN72: The Hollywood Reporter should be italicized
    •  Done
  • FN's 78 and 79: Should simply read "New York"
    •  Done
  • FN82: The New York Times should be italicized
    •  Done

Hope this helps! Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Snuggums! All done except on a couple, didn't know what you meant by "FN37 is the same as FN20", did you mean like make both Times not capitalized? And then you said 38 isn't reliable but it's the New York Times, so I didn't know if that was a mistake or not? LADY LOTUSTALK 11:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that was a mistake on my part. You did everything right :). Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lol awesome, thanks so much! LADY LOTUSTALK 20:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]