Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review/JAS 39 Gripen

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JAS 39 Gripen[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I've listed this article for peer review to get comments to help improve article. Maybe improve it to Good Article nomination quality.

Thanks,

Fnlayson (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Born2flie[edit]

  1. Grammar
    • It seems that there is a lot of changing of the tense of the verbs just within the first few paragraphs of the Development section. Since it all occurred in the past, I think it should all be past tense.
    • "The Gripen got its name in a public competition in 1982." I think it should read something more like, "The JAS 39 received the name Gripen as the result of a public competition in 1982," and it should then lead into the conversation about the Saab heraldry, etc.
    • There are a lot of short paragraphs. I'm sure it is because the treatment of the subject of those paragraphs was so short in the references. It will probably come up during GA-review though. (MOS reference)
  2. Format
    • The bolding under the Development section for describing the acronym JAS is not required. (MOS reference)
    • If "Attack" is spelled the same in English as it is in Swedish, there should be no italics. (MOS reference)
      I found a dubious reference (a blog) that says the Swedish word for Attack is Attaten. It would be nice to clarify that with a native speaker or someone familiar with the language. I know the Gripen website] states "Attack" as the word represented by the A in JAS. --Born2flie (talk) 16:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      "Attack" (pronounced [ut-tuck], stress on last syllable) is spelt the same way in Swedish as in English, and has the same meaning (take it from a native Swedish-speaker). Only nuances or specific contexts may differ. It may have a more specific "physical" usage in Swedish; one person attacking another (in English the word "assault" would probably be appropriate here). In sport, the word "anfall" is used more often than "attack". There should be italics on Attack, too. The JAS abbreviation is obviously for three Swedish words, not for one Swedish, one English, and then another Swedish word. In military aviation context, "attack" should translate to "Air-to-Ground" or "Air-to-Surface". "Jakt" (pronounced [yuckt]) - the J - translates to "hunt" or "chase" (rävjakt = foxhunt, biljakt = car chase), in mil-av-speak, though, to "Air-to-Air". LarRan (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      I yield to the native Swedish speaker. :) --Born2flie (talk) 07:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at it again in a couple of days. --Born2flie (talk) 09:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks Born. I addressed most of that except for italics on attack and the short paragraphs. I think there needs to be more development info on the aircraft. I've got some books to help with this now. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fnlayson[edit]

  • Comments: I think the article needs to tell more history of its development. I've tried to add some text on its beginning and will try to add more. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This review looks dead. Any other comments will more likely be seen at Talk:JAS 39 Gripen. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Peer_review/JAS_39_Gripen&oldid=234887295"