Wikipedia talk:Existence does not prove notability

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This page was nominated for deletion on 27 March 2011. The result of the discussion was Keep.

It's a cause for sadness that you should think that this is so true that you need not provide an argument for any of it. Personally, I hold this view: http://www.artofeurope.com/blake/bla3.htm

and consequently I think you are doing a work of destruction, and it's a pity. Grace Note (talk) 01:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What on God's green Earth is that supposed to mean? This essay is essentially a rather zesty synthesis of WP:V, WP:N, and parts of WP:NOT. The arguments are all in basic Wikipedia policy, if you really want to see them. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 00:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia thinks that you are notable because you are American there is nothing to do with source or if anybody cares about you. Many Eastern Celebrities that we care about , we submitted articles about and have millions of Followers throughout the world , Wikipedia does not think them as Notable. Pewdiepie is Notable, I understand but, Pewdiepie's Wife is not but Wikipedia thinks she is.

Many Indian YouTubers and Streamers who have millions, I mean over 20 Million Followers and have been wrote about in many news articles like in TimesOfIndia , India.com ,etc. Interviewed by so many news channels still don't exist is Wikipedia's Notability list . Its not that nobody wrote about them, I wrote about many of them and they could have been improved overtime but Wikipedia's talented reviewers deleted the pages without even giving any reason before doing so. Later I found on a talk page that they think they were not Notable enough to be in Wikipedia.

These people are so famous that they are called on by Sony in Movie premieres with other celebrities in United States , these people are not only famous they are doing something that nobody else does in the whole world but Wikipedia doesn't think them as Notable. Like Ashish Chanchlani

Small streamers that nobody knows about and have only about 2 Million Followers are still in Wikipedia's notability list just because they speak English and are from America and their viewers are from United States. Souradip Mandal (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So as I understand it from your text...[edit]

... notability is 'basically' (as you put it) being American? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:B97F:75EA:79BD:912A (talk) 23:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is True if you not American you should not exist as notable Souradip Mandal (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]