Éliphas Lévi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by -sche (talk | contribs) at 17:20, 9 October 2020 (→‎Early period). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Éliphas Lévi
Born
Alphonse Louis Constant

(1810-02-08)8 February 1810
Died31 May 1875(1875-05-31) (aged 65)

Éliphas Lévi Zahed, born Alphonse Louis Constant (8 February 1810 – 31 May 1875), was a French sage, poet, and author of more than twenty books about magic, kabbalah, alchemical studies, and occultism. Considered the greatest occultist of the nineteenth century,[1] he followed the ecclesiastical career in the Catholic Church until, with a particularly great struggle, at the age of 26, he quit the priestly path. Only much later in his life, at the age of 40, did he attain the knowledge of the occult, also becoming a ceremonial magician.[2]

"Éliphas Lévi", the name under which he published his books, was his attempt to translate or transliterate his given names "Alphonse Louis" into the Hebrew language.

Levi acquired the profile of an original thinker and writer whose works attracted the attention of the very heterogeneous ambiences of the era, from Paris to London, from esotericists to artists of romantic or symbolist inspiration. He also expressed his independence by leaving the Masonic lodge of the "Great Orient", believing that it was a form of modern secularization, where knowledge of the original meanings of symbols and rituals was lost. Levi had a profound dislike of their persecution against the Catholic Church: "I ceased being a freemason, at once, because the freemasons, excommunicated by the Pope, did not believe in tolerating Catholicism."[3]

Levi resolutely rejected the superstitions of the epoch, such as spiritism and reincarnation. According to René Guénon, "the abbot was essentially an antispiritist and never believed in reincarnation. If he sometimes presented himself as a reincarnation of Rabelais, he did so only in the sense of an intellectual joke."[4]

Many authors influenced profoundly his development, such as the french monarchist Joseph de Maistre, whom he quotes in many parts of his Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, Paracelsus, Robert Fludd, Swedenborg, Fabre d'Olivet, the Rosicrucianists, Plato, Raymond Lull, and other esoterics.[5]

Authors who have been influenced by him include the UR Group,[6] René Guénon,[7] Dragoš Kalajić,[8] Julius Evola, Papus, Joséphin Péladan, Joscelyn Godwin, Valentin Tomberg, and others.

Life

Early period

Constant was the son of a shoemaker in Paris. In 1832 he entered the seminary of Saint Sulpice to study to enter the Roman Catholic priesthood, as a sub-deacon he was responsible for catechism, later he was ordained a deacon, remaining a cleric to the rest of his life. One week before being ordained to the priesthood, he decided to leave the priestly path, however the spirit of charity and the life he had in the seminary stayed with him through the rest of his life, later he wrote that he had acquired an understanding of faith and science without conflicts. [9]

In 1836, in leaving the priestly path he felt the anger of his superiors. He had done permanent vows of chastity and obedience as a sub-deacon and deacon, returning to civil life was particularly very painful for him, he continued to wear the clerical clothes, the cassocks until 1844. Experiencing a kind of social crisis, as Levi left the seminary he dedicated himself to revolutionary action, the production of pamphlets in the spirit of utopian socialism and panhumanism, which opened the doors of prisons.[10] He had to fight against extreme poverty by working as a tutor in Paris, during this period he had various crises of conscience. Around 1838, he met and was influenced by the views of the androgynous socialist mystic Simon Ganneau, and it may have been through Ganneau's meetings that he also met Flora Tristan.[11][12][13] In 1839 he entered the monastic life in the Abbey of Solesmes, he could not maintain the discipline so he quit the monastery. Upon leaving the monastery returning to Paris he wrote the Bible of Liberty, which resulted in his imprisonment in August 1841.

He married a girl named Noémie in 1846, whom he had several children. From reliable sources it is known that his descendants are living in France today.[14]

Unexpectedly, in 1850, at the age of forty, Levi experienced a new, this time spiritual or spiritualist crisis, which introduced him to the world of modern esotericism and occultism. He was introduced previous to this crisis to esoteric teachers and works, under whose influence he wrote the first work of its kind: Dogma and the Ritual of High Magic. As the last connection with the previous world, his young wife leaves him, unwilling to follow him in his new path.[15] [16]

Later period

The tenth key of the tarot, in The Key of the Mysteries

In December 1851, Napoleon III organized a coup that would end the Second Republic and give rise to the Second Empire. Similar to many other socialists at the time, Constant saw the emperor as the defender of the people and the restorer of public order. In the Moniteur parisien of 1852, Constant praised the new government's actions as "veritably socialist," but he soon became disillusioned with the rigid dictatorship and was eventually imprisoned in 1855 for publishing a polemical chanson against the Emperor. What had changed, however, was Constant's attitude towards "the people." As early as in La Fête-Dieu and Le livre des larmes from 1845, he had been skeptical of the uneducated people's ability to emancipate themselves. Similar to the Saint-Simonians, he had adopted the theocratical ideas of Joseph de Maistre in order to call for the establishment of a "spiritual authority" led by an élite class of priests. After the disaster of 1849, he was completely convinced that the "masses" were not able to establish a harmonious order and needed instruction (a concept similar to other socialist doctrines such as the "revolution from above", the Avantgarde, or the Partei neuen Typs).[17][need quotation to verify]

Constant's activities reflect the socialist struggle to come to terms both with the failure of 1848 and the tough repressions by the new government. He participated on the socialist Revue philosophique et religieuse, founded by his old friend Fauvety, wherein he propagated his "Kabbalistic" ideas, for the first time in public, in 1855-1856 (notably using his civil name). The debates in the Revue do not only show the tensions between the old "Romantic Socialism" of the Saint-Simonians and Fourierists, they also demonstrate how natural it was for a socialist writer to discuss topics like magic, the Kabbalah, or the occult sciences in a socialist journal.[18]

It has been shown that Constant developed his ideas about magic in a specific milieu that was marked by the confluence of socialist and magnetistic ideas.[19] Influential authors included Henri Delaage (1825–1882) and Jean du Potet de Sennevoy, who were, to different extents, propagating magnetistic, magical, and kabbalistic ideas as the foundation of a superior form of socialism. Constant used a system of magnetism and dream magic to critique what he saw as the excesses of philosophical materialism.[20][need quotation to verify]

Lévi began to write Histoire de la magie in 1860. The following year, in 1861, he published a sequel to Dogme et rituel, La clef des grands mystères ("The Key to the Great Mysteries"). In 1861 Lévi revisited London. Further magical works by Lévi include Fables et symboles ("Stories and Images"), 1862, Le sorcier de Meudon ("The Wizard of Meudon", an extended edition of two novels originally published in 1847) 1861, and La science des esprits ("The Science of Spirits"), 1865. In 1868, he wrote Le grand arcane, ou l'occultisme Dévoilé ("The Great Secret, or Occultism Unveiled"); this, however, was only published posthumously in 1898.[citation needed]

Constant resumed the use of openly socialist language after the government had loosened the restrictions against socialist doctrines in 1859. From La clef on, he extensively cited his radical writings, even his infamous Bible de la liberté. He continued to develop his idea of an élite of initiates that would lead the people to its final emancipation. In several passages he explicitly identified socialism, Catholicism, and occultism.[21]

The magic propagated by Éliphas Lévi became a great success, especially after his death. That Spiritualism was popular on both sides of the Atlantic from the 1850s contributed to this success. However, Lévi diverged from spiritualism and criticized it, because he believed only mental images and "astral forces" persisted after an individual died, which could be freely manipulated by skilled magicians, unlike the autonomous spirits that Spiritualism posited.[22][page needed] His magical teachings were free from obvious fanaticisms, even if they remained rather murky; he had nothing to sell, and did not pretend to be the initiate of some ancient or fictitious secret society. He incorporated the Tarot cards into his magical system, and as a result the Tarot has been an important part of the paraphernalia of Western magicians.[23] He had a deep impact on the magic of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and later on the ex–Golden Dawn member Aleister Crowley. He was also the first to declare that a pentagram or five-pointed star with one point down and two points up represents evil, while a pentagram with one point up and two points down represents good. Lévi's ideas also influenced Helena Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society.[24][need quotation to verify] It was largely through the occultists inspired by him that Lévi is remembered as one of the key founders of the 20th-century revival of magic.[citation needed]

Socialist background and alleged initiation

It was long believed that the socialist Constant disappeared with the demise of the Second Republic and gave way to the occultist Éliphas Lévi. It has been argued recently, however, that this narrative was constructed at the end of the nineteenth century in occultist circles and was uncritically adopted by later scholarship. According to this argument, Constant not only developed his "occultism" as a direct consequence of his socialist and neo-catholic ideas, but he continued to propagate the realization of "true socialism" throughout his entire life.[25]

According to the narrative developed by the occultist Papus (Gérard Encausse) and cemented by the occultist biographer Paul Chacornac, Constant's turn to occultism was the result of an "initiation" by the eccentric Polish expatriate Józef Maria Hoene-Wroński. However, it has been argued that Wronski's influence had been brief, between 1852 and 1853, and superficial.[26] However, this narrative had been developed before Papus and his companions had any access to reliable information about Constant's life. This becomes most obvious in the light of the fact that Papus had tried to contact Constant by mail on 11 January 1886 – almost eleven years after his death. The two did know each other, as evidenced in Constant's 6 January 1853 letter to Hoene-Wroński, thanking him for including one of Constant's articles in Hoené-Wroński's 1852 work, Historiosophie ou science de l’histoire. In the letter Constant expresses his admiration for Hoené-Wroński's "still underappreciated genius" and calls himself his "sincere admirer and devoted disciple".[27] Later on, the construction of a specifically French esoteric tradition, in which Constant was to form a crucial link, perpetuated this idea of a clear rupture between the socialist Constant and the occultist Lévi. A different narrative was developed independently by Arthur Edward Waite, who had even less information about Constant's life.[28]

Also, a journey to London that Constant made in May 1854 did not cause his preoccupation with magic, although he seems to have been involved in practical magic for the first time. Instead, it was the aforementioned socialist-magnetistic context that formed the background of Constant's interest in magic.[29] The relationship between Constant and the novelist Edward Bulwer-Lytton was not as intimate as it is often claimed.[30] In fact, Bulwer-Lytton's famous novel A Strange Story (1862) includes a rather unflattering remark about Constant's Dogme et rituel.[31][32]

Definition of magic

Lévi's works are filled with various definitions for magic and the magician:

Magic

  • "To practice magic is to be a quack; to know magic is to be a sage."
  • "Magic is the divinity of man conquered by science in union with faith; the true Magi are Men-Gods, in virtue of their intimate union with the divine principle."[33]

Magician

  • "He looks on the wicked as invalids whom one must pity and cure; the world, with its errors and vices, is to him God's hospital, and he wishes to serve in it."
  • "They are without fears and without desires, dominated by no falsehood, sharing no error, loving without illusion, suffering without impatience, reposing in the quietude of eternal thought... a Magus cannot be ignorant, for magic implies superiority, mastership, majority, and majority signifies emancipation by knowledge. The Magus welcomes pleasure, accepts wealth, deserves honour, but is never the slave of one of them; he knows how to be poor, to abstain, and to suffer; he endures oblivion willingly because he is lord of his own happiness, and expects or fears nothing from the caprice of fortune. He can love without being beloved; he can create imperishable treasures, and exalt himself above the level of honours or the prizes of the lottery. He possesses that which he seeks, namely, profound peace. He regrets nothing which must end, but remembers with satisfaction that he has met with good in all. His hope is a certitude, for he knows that good is eternal and evil transitory. He enjoys solitude, but does not fly the society of man; he is a child with children, joyous with the young, staid with the old, patient with the foolish, happy with the wise. He smiles with all who smile, and mourns with all who weep; applauding strength, he is yet indulgent to weakness; offending no one, he has himself no need to pardon, for he never thinks himself offended; he pities those who misconceive him, and seeks an opportunity to serve them; by the force of kindness only does he avenge himself on the ungrateful..."
  • "Judge not; speak hardly at all; love and act."
Éliphas Lévi's Tetragrammaton pentagram, which he considered to be a symbol of the microcosm, or human being

Cultural references

Selected writings

  • La Bible de la liberté (The Bible of Liberty), 1841
  • Doctrines religieuses et sociales (Religious and Social Doctrines), 1841
  • L'assomption de la femme (The Assumption of Woman), 1841
  • La mère de Dieu (The Mother of God), 1844
  • Le livre des larmes (The Book of Tears), 1845
  • Le testament de la liberté (The Testament of Liberty), 1848
  • Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, (Transcendental Magic, its Doctrine and Ritual), 1854–1856
  • Histoire de la magie, (The History of Magic), 1860
  • La clef des grands mystères (The Key to the Great Mysteries), 1861
  • Fables et symboles (Stories and Images), 1862
  • La science des esprits (The Science of Spirits), 1865
  • Le grand arcane, ou l'occultisme dévoilé (The Great Secret, or Occultism Unveiled), 1868
  • Magical Rituals of the Sanctum Regnum, 1892, 1970
  • The Book of Splendours: The Inner Mysteries of Qabalism

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ https://www.grupopensamento.com.br/produto/dogma-e-ritual-da-alta-magia-nova-edicao-5550
  2. ^ Christopher McIntosh, Éliphas Lévi and the French Occult Revival, 1972.
  3. ^ https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/esoterica/levi_e/levi_notes.html
  4. ^ http://www.dragoskalajic.com/?l=elifas-levi
  5. ^ Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie p.34
  6. ^ Introduction to Magic, UR Group
  7. ^ Crisis of the Modern World
  8. ^ http://www.dragoskalajic.com/
  9. ^ Dogma And Ritual of the High Magic p.30
  10. ^ http://www.dragoskalajic.com/?l=elifas-levi
  11. ^ Naomi Judith Andrews, Socialism's Muse: Gender in the Intellectual Landscape of French Romantic Socialism (2006), pages 40-41, 95, 102
  12. ^ Susan Grogan, Flora Tristan: Life Stories (2002), pages 193-194
  13. ^ Francis Bertin, Esotérisme et socialisme (1995), page 53
  14. ^ http://www.cercle-langage-sacre.fr/en/eliphas-levi-biography/
  15. ^ http://www.dragoskalajic.com/?l=elifas-levi
  16. ^ http://www.cercle-langage-sacre.fr/en/eliphas-levi-biography/
  17. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 418–426. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  18. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 470–488. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  19. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 523–563. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  20. ^ Josephson-Storm 2017, p. 106.
  21. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 565–589. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  22. ^ Josephson-Storm 2017.
  23. ^ Josephson, Jason Ānanda (May 2013). "God's Shadow: Occluded Possibilities in the Genealogy of Religion". History of Religions, Vol. 52, No. 4, 321. doi:10.1086/669644. JSTOR 10.1086/669644.
  24. ^ Josephson-Storm 2017, p. 116.
  25. ^ Strube, Julian (29 March 2016). "Socialist religion and the emergence of occultism: a genealogical approach to socialism and secularization in 19th-century France". Religion. 0 (3): 359–388. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2016.1146926. ISSN 0048-721X. S2CID 147626697.
  26. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 426–438. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  27. ^ Rafał T. Prinke, Uczeń Wrońskiego - Éliphas Lévi w kręgu polskich mesjanistów, Pamiętnik Biblioteki Kórnickiej, Zeszyt 30., Red. Barbara Wysocka. 2013, p. 133
  28. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 590–618. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  29. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 455–470. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  30. ^ C. Nelson Stewart, Bulwer Lytton as Occultist 1996:36 notes that the one surviving letter from Lévi to Lytton "would appear to be addressed to a stranger or to a very distant acquaintance" (A. E. Waite).
  31. ^ Strube 2016, pp. 584–585. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrube2016 (help)
  32. ^ Bulwer Lytton, Edward Jones (1862). A Strange Story. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz. p. 249. Hence the author of Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, printed at Paris, 185-53 — a book less remarkable for tis learning than for the earnest belief of a scholar of our own day in the reality of the art of which be records of history — insists much on the necessity of rigidly observing Le Ternaire, in the number of persons who assist in an enchanter's experiments.
  33. ^ Lévi, Éliphas; Blavatsky, H. P. (2007). Paradoxes of the Highest Science. Wildside Press LLC. p. 15. ISBN 9781434401069.
  34. ^ Powell, Anthony (1962). The Kindly Ones (University of Chicago Press electronic edition 2010 ed.). University of Chicago Press. p. 192. ISBN 0-226-67739-7. Retrieved 2 July 2020.

Sources

Further reading

External links