Jump to content

User talk:AngelOfSadness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 24.188.111.83 - ""
Line 48: Line 48:
:Well the clear blocklog, the vandal fighting, content contributions, helping newbies, history of civilness and communication with other editors are all a plus for the Rfa. However, I will say that because you've been on Wikipedia for such a long time but have only the two thousand edits, it could be a problem for some of the Rfa !voters (and unfortunately I have seen some people vote neutral and sometimes oppose but it really depends on the individual candidate and who !votes in the Rfa). Especially, when there are months of gaps in your contribution history that could also be a slight problem and Rfa !voters would expect a good reason for that. I, personally, wouldn't oppose a candidate on that but quite a few people expect a lot out of an Rfa candidate(and it seems that some almost expect that the Rfa candidate shouldn't have a real life :D) even though adminship is no big deal. Maybe wait a few more months (like about two at least) to clock up some vandal edits and make some more major content contributions and then hopefully that should be enough so the !voters should be focusing too much on the time gaps/number of edits. If they see that you are a vandal fighter, can deal with vandals/newbies properly and has a number of major contributions to a number of different articles (they don't have to be upgraded to GA, FA or anything like that). Hopefully this can help bubt so far you have done wonderful work so keep that up :D [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 14:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
:Well the clear blocklog, the vandal fighting, content contributions, helping newbies, history of civilness and communication with other editors are all a plus for the Rfa. However, I will say that because you've been on Wikipedia for such a long time but have only the two thousand edits, it could be a problem for some of the Rfa !voters (and unfortunately I have seen some people vote neutral and sometimes oppose but it really depends on the individual candidate and who !votes in the Rfa). Especially, when there are months of gaps in your contribution history that could also be a slight problem and Rfa !voters would expect a good reason for that. I, personally, wouldn't oppose a candidate on that but quite a few people expect a lot out of an Rfa candidate(and it seems that some almost expect that the Rfa candidate shouldn't have a real life :D) even though adminship is no big deal. Maybe wait a few more months (like about two at least) to clock up some vandal edits and make some more major content contributions and then hopefully that should be enough so the !voters should be focusing too much on the time gaps/number of edits. If they see that you are a vandal fighter, can deal with vandals/newbies properly and has a number of major contributions to a number of different articles (they don't have to be upgraded to GA, FA or anything like that). Hopefully this can help bubt so far you have done wonderful work so keep that up :D [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 14:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


i have 2 goldfish one is a little bigger than the other if i put them in the same tank will the one eat the other one? please answer quickly!!!!!
i have 2 goldfish one is a little bigger than the other if i put them in the same tank will the one eat the other one? please answer quickly!!!!! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.188.111.83|24.188.111.83]] ([[User talk:24.188.111.83|talk]]) 23:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 23:14, 14 August 2008

Leave me a message here. New messages go underneath old ones. Please sign your posts with ~~~~
Also, any angry, uncivil, or trolling comments/personal attacks left here will only add to the talkpage vandalism counter.
This user's page has been vandalized 193 times.

Jagger Joseph Blue

Give me a reason why you protected Jason Goldberg and Soleil Moon Frye pages over their transsexual baby girl named Jagger Joseph Blue. 60.53.88.127 1:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Looking at the edits, my guess is violation of multiple policies and guidelines, including at worst vandalism, and at best those on original research and biographies of living persons, edit-warring, the 3-revert rule and refusal to discuss your proposed edits on the article's talk page. If you can find a reliable source supporting your assertion, cite it; otherwise it doesn't go in the article. --Clubjuggle T/C 04:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What Clubjuggle has said is exactly right and page protection in this case was more than warranted (because of: BLP violations(unsourced and unverifiable content/original research), NPOV violations, vandalism, edit-warring, 3rr etc. all coming from a seemingly dynamic IP and with no other IPs were making constructive edits which could be prevented in semi-protection). So there's five good reasons for the page protection. If you feel it's not a BLP violation/vandalism/original research/NPOV violation and indeed have a reliable source for the claims, please cite your reliable source at either one/both of the article's talkpages. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 17:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bodac

Is me and my bodies band were just trying to promote if u can help build a wikipedia page with us that would be awsome ty so much and rais hell to those who should be punished ty.

Famt13 (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First thing you shouldn't write about things that you are connected to as it presents a conflict of interest. Secondly Wikipedia is not an advertising service so using Wikipedia to promote a non-notable band doen't go down well. Thirdly, I deleted the article because it did not assert the importance or significance of the band therefore, given the article's then-state, it was deleted under the speedy deletion critera. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 21:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bodac

im the smartest one in the band and there is no conflict in interest were like green jelly[[1]] at the moment we suck but we want to show people we can put at leat a wiki up since it cant manage a myspace right now please help us ty. Famt13 (talk) 21:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No: conflict of interest(on wikipedia) is when someone creates a Wikipedia article on a subject which they are close/connected to like a band/company/family relation and other editors disagree with the article's existance (as in the article does not comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines). Anyway, first I have to ask if the band (not the article) has achieved any of the critera of WP:MUSIC#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles before any article creation can commence. Also if you have any third-party sources that are independant of the subject to back up the claims that would be great. AngelOfSadness talk 21:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Thank you very much for the note of welcome, I've been here a while though.(StevenEdmondson (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Ok, well I thought I would welcome you considering no one else had taken advantage of the honour yet :). But if you have any questions, you know where to find me and I'll be happy to answer them :). AngelOfSadness talk 18:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again, it was nice of you to do so. Sorry if I came across as overly hostile or a little unappreciative in my earlier message.(StevenEdmondson (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]
You're welcome and if you're wondering I didn't think that you came across at all hostile or unappreciative. AngelOfSadness talk 18:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) You even got to change my count to another milestone. =D -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. And congrats on the 300th vandalism on your userpage :D. Shame the vandal was so boring :P AngelOfSadness talk 14:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it...

I was considering an RfA (after User:Rick Block suggested it). Can I get your thoughts? --Clubjuggle T/C 14:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well the clear blocklog, the vandal fighting, content contributions, helping newbies, history of civilness and communication with other editors are all a plus for the Rfa. However, I will say that because you've been on Wikipedia for such a long time but have only the two thousand edits, it could be a problem for some of the Rfa !voters (and unfortunately I have seen some people vote neutral and sometimes oppose but it really depends on the individual candidate and who !votes in the Rfa). Especially, when there are months of gaps in your contribution history that could also be a slight problem and Rfa !voters would expect a good reason for that. I, personally, wouldn't oppose a candidate on that but quite a few people expect a lot out of an Rfa candidate(and it seems that some almost expect that the Rfa candidate shouldn't have a real life :D) even though adminship is no big deal. Maybe wait a few more months (like about two at least) to clock up some vandal edits and make some more major content contributions and then hopefully that should be enough so the !voters should be focusing too much on the time gaps/number of edits. If they see that you are a vandal fighter, can deal with vandals/newbies properly and has a number of major contributions to a number of different articles (they don't have to be upgraded to GA, FA or anything like that). Hopefully this can help bubt so far you have done wonderful work so keep that up :D AngelOfSadness talk 14:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have 2 goldfish one is a little bigger than the other if i put them in the same tank will the one eat the other one? please answer quickly!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.111.83 (talk) 23:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]