User talk:Searchtruthseeker
September 2008
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Afro-Brazilian. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Pardo, you will be blocked from editing. The Ogre (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Sub-Saharan DNA admixture in Europe, you will be blocked from editing. The Ogre (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Afro-Brazilian, you will be blocked from editing. The Ogre (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Afro-Brazilian. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. The Ogre (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Removal of sourced information
[edit]If you replace sourced information with alternative information, then you are obliged to provide your supporting sources. Otherwise, let the sourced information stand. You are already on your last warning. Ian Cairns (talk) 14:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Broken edits
[edit]Whether you realise it or not, your edits are breaking the links of the existing article. Please take more care - your edits are indistinguishable from deliberate vandalism. Ian Cairns (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Please...
[edit]Searchtruthseeker, I see that you are new here. Wikipedia has rules. And it is not about the truth but about what published credible sources say the truth is. Please be mindfull to...
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
And
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Otherwise (PLEASE read the links)...
|
Replacement of sourced information with unsourced information
[edit]Ian Cairns (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
[edit]A case against you has been opened at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Searchtruthseeker. The Ogre (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. |