Jump to content

Talk:Sziklai pair: Revision history

View logs for this page (view filter log)

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 22:2922:29, 9 February 2024‎ Cewbot talk contribs‎ m 11,991 bytes +46‎ Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Electron}}. undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

curprev 23:4423:44, 8 November 2023‎ VoidHalo talk contribs‎ 11,945 bytes +1,084‎ →‎General question about citations.: new section undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic

curprev 12:3712:37, 12 August 2023‎ Cewbot talk contribs‎ 10,861 bytes +889‎ Reminder of an inactive anchor: class AB amplifier undo

curprev 23:5323:53, 17 December 2022‎ 181.225.181.225 talk‎ 9,972 bytes +560‎ →‎Is "Sziklai pair" a case of misattribution?: Reply undo Tag: Reply

curprev 21:2821:28, 20 May 2022‎ Wtshymanski talk contribs‎ 9,412 bytes +504‎ →‎Is "Sziklai pair" a case of misattribution?: Beware citogenisis... undo

curprev 02:2402:24, 8 May 2022‎ 2600:1702:3b00:7eb0:e853:f3f7:7dae:2a21 talk‎ 8,908 bytes 0‎ →‎Is "Sziklsi pair" a case of misattribution? undo
curprev 02:2402:24, 8 May 2022‎ 2600:1702:3b00:7eb0:e853:f3f7:7dae:2a21 talk‎ 8,908 bytes +1,106‎ →‎Is "Sziklsi pair" a case of misattribution?: new section undo

curprev 09:2709:27, 6 February 2022‎ 81.154.179.214 talk‎ 7,802 bytes +151‎ →‎"Sziklai Pair" or "Sziklai pair"? undo

curprev 22:1822:18, 23 September 2021‎ Mortense talk contribs‎ 7,651 bytes +216‎ →‎"Sziklai Pair" or "Sziklai pair"?: new section undo

curprev 21:3321:33, 28 December 2020‎ Mbennett555 talk contribs‎ m 7,435 bytes 0‎ Mbennett555 moved page Talk:Complementary feedback pair to Talk:Sziklai pair over redirect: The subject of this article is most often called a "Sziklai Pair", not a "Complementary Feedback Pair". undo

curprev 12:0512:05, 19 June 2019‎ Störm talk contribs‎ m 7,435 bytes 0‎ Störm moved page Talk:Sziklai pair to Talk:Complementary feedback pair undo

curprev 23:0523:05, 26 March 2016‎ 142.68.70.169 talk‎ 7,435 bytes +1,230‎ →‎Pushing and Pulling undo

curprev 06:5706:57, 31 March 2010‎ Kisss256 talk contribs‎ m 6,205 bytes +195‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 06:5606:56, 23 January 2010‎ 151.204.252.51 talk‎ 6,010 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 06:5506:55, 23 January 2010‎ 151.204.252.51 talk‎ 6,011 bytes +871‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 20:1820:18, 18 May 2009‎ TedPavlic talk contribs‎ 5,140 bytes +187‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?: See recent changes that attempt to synthesize this whole discussion. Lots of {{Fact}}s needed to be filled in. undo
curprev 01:3301:33, 18 May 2009‎ Midgemagnet talk contribs‎ 4,953 bytes +764‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce? undo

curprev 18:4618:46, 7 May 2009‎ TedPavlic talk contribs‎ m 4,189 bytes +8‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?: (wikified mobility in previous comment addition) undo
curprev 18:4518:45, 7 May 2009‎ TedPavlic talk contribs‎ 4,181 bytes +786‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?: Replaced scarce with expensive, but both are as accuracte. Asymmetric mobility is the issue, right? undo
curprev 10:0410:04, 7 May 2009‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 3,395 bytes +295‎ Signing comment by 212.84.126.62 - "→‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?: " undo
curprev 10:0310:03, 7 May 2009‎ 212.84.126.62 talk‎ 3,100 bytes +904‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce? undo

curprev 12:1112:11, 11 March 2009‎ 89.136.41.31 talk‎ 2,196 bytes +186‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 08:4808:48, 7 March 2009‎ 89.136.39.53 talk‎ 2,010 bytes +417‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce? undo
curprev 03:3603:36, 7 March 2009‎ Rogerbrent talk contribs‎ 1,593 bytes +98‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce? undo
curprev 03:3303:33, 7 March 2009‎ Rogerbrent talk contribs‎ 1,495 bytes +163‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce? undo

curprev 22:3222:32, 6 March 2009‎ 89.136.39.53 talk‎ 1,332 bytes +694‎ →‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?: new section undo
curprev 22:1822:18, 6 March 2009‎ 89.136.39.53 talk‎ 638 bytes +220‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 21:4421:44, 2 December 2007‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 418 bytes +265‎ Signing comment by Tosendo - "" undo
curprev 21:4221:42, 2 December 2007‎ Tosendo talk contribs‎ 153 bytes +114‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 05:3405:34, 20 March 2007‎ Searchme talk contribs‎ 39 bytes +39‎ {{Electron|class=Start|importance=Mid}}

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sziklai_pair"