Jump to content

Template:Conservatism sidebar: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 August 2024

1 August 2024

29 July 2024

28 July 2024

23 July 2024

10 July 2024

8 July 2024

  • curprev 06:2406:24, 8 July 2024Trakking talk contribs 11,845 bytes −60 reversion of good faith edits: only articles with a direct connection to the topic ought to be included; there is no explicit mention of conservatism in the respective articles; in fact there are many leftist scholars mentioned in the article on Philosophical anthropology
  • curprev 01:5101:51, 8 July 2024Biohistorian15 talk contribs 11,905 bytes +30 Much like "Philosophical anthropology" before: a field that is (de facto) VERY conservative for reasons I am not entirely sure about

6 July 2024

  • curprev 15:4115:41, 6 July 2024GreenLoeb talk contribs 11,875 bytes +18 Readd natural law, I'm not sure I grasp why it was removed. It is hard to think of a more central concept in conservative thought. It is the kernel upon which Aristotle, Aquinas, and the various Catholic reactionaries build their thought. Liberalism has this concept as well, but how liberalism transforms the meaning of this is important. Liberalism doesn't own the idea. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:1411:14, 6 July 2024Trakking talk contribs 11,857 bytes −55 removal of "natural law" which is a central concept of classical liberalism

5 July 2024

3 July 2024

2 July 2024

1 July 2024

29 June 2024

24 June 2024

21 June 2024

19 June 2024

  • curprev 10:3710:37, 19 June 2024Trakking talk contribs 12,059 bytes −7 addition of a prominent Islamic scholar in order to make the list more global; removal of Hitchens after an insightful comment by GreenLoeb
  • curprev 00:0000:00, 19 June 2024GreenLoeb talk contribs 12,066 bytes +173 Undid revision 1229838633 by GreenLoeb (talk) Self-revert of the Mishima edit for now, as I can see an argument though I'm not wholly convinced. I do think we should hash out at some point where to draw the line between conservatism and reaction/extreme right, for purposes of inclusion in this template. Tag: Undo

18 June 2024

  • curprev 23:5723:57, 18 June 2024GreenLoeb talk contribsm 11,893 bytes −173 Rem. Mishima. I like his novels, but I think with a figure like him we are really blurring the lines between conservatism and straightforward reactionary modernism. I agree with the desire to make this list more global, but there must be a better representative of Japan. Also, not sure to what extent he qualifies as an intellectual (his novels are not quite the same in terms of philosophical exploration as, say, Dostoevsky, who I do think belongs here) Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 23:4223:42, 18 June 2024GreenLoeb talk contribsm 12,066 bytes +46 Readd Mansfield, who is a major thinker. I can see the argument for excluding him because of notability for a non-US template, but he is certainly more relevant to worldwide conservatism as a thinker than Hitchens (who is primarily a journalist) or Sowell (whose international relevance is dubious, and whose books lack philosophic heft)
  • curprev 23:2923:29, 18 June 2024Trakking talk contribs 12,020 bytes +33 addition of four prominent intellectuals and removal of another four who, although brilliant, are not as notable as the other ones on the list
  • curprev 23:0623:06, 18 June 2024GreenLoeb talk contribs 11,987 bytes 0 fixing inverted invisible text
  • curprev 23:0123:01, 18 June 2024Trakking talk contribs 11,987 bytes +270 addition of an Israeli, a Hungarian, a Brazilian, and a Japanese in order to make the section more global; also addition of Eliot, who was missing from the list

17 June 2024

13 June 2024

11 June 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)