Jump to content

User talk:Pantherskin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pantherskin (talk | contribs)
Line 62: Line 62:
::No, actually, we extend good faith to all editors. I'm assuming your disputing this content and source and have asked for others to help see the best way forward. The results of which should stay with the article for future editors to see why some decisions were made. I was restoring sourced content that had been removed without explanation and you accused me of purposely damaging the encyclopedia by perpetuating a hoax with no evidence the information is untrue or that I was purposely hoaxing anything. As a suggestion, make it clear next time why you are removing something and make a path for dialog. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#AA0022">oi</font></u>]] 20:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
::No, actually, we extend good faith to all editors. I'm assuming your disputing this content and source and have asked for others to help see the best way forward. The results of which should stay with the article for future editors to see why some decisions were made. I was restoring sourced content that had been removed without explanation and you accused me of purposely damaging the encyclopedia by perpetuating a hoax with no evidence the information is untrue or that I was purposely hoaxing anything. As a suggestion, make it clear next time why you are removing something and make a path for dialog. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#AA0022">oi</font></u>]] 20:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
:: As a suggestion to you, think before you edit an article. [[User:Pantherskin|Pantherskin]] ([[User talk:Pantherskin#top|talk]]) 05:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
:: As a suggestion to you, think before you edit an article. [[User:Pantherskin|Pantherskin]] ([[User talk:Pantherskin#top|talk]]) 05:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

== Arbcom clerk warning ==

You have recently engaged in a series of posts on ArbCom pages which were deliberately inflammatory and breached the specific guidelines on user conduct handed down by ArbCom concerning the EEML case. You are thus receiving a first and final warning. Any further misconduct will result in a ban from the relevant ArbCom pages until the conclusion of the EEML case. Violation of that ban will result in blocking. [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 12:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:40, 29 October 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Pantherskin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like List of companies of Georgia (Country) , may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shinerunner (talk) 02:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC) ‎[reply]

sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marbehraglaim‎‎ . Thank you. ► RATEL ◄ 05:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, how low can one sink. Pantherskin (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPA

Clearly you are yet another SPA set up to harass me. You are one sick puppy. ► RATEL ◄ 02:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC) SPI proved nothing, so this would be a PA.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 20:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its only a puppet!

I would sugest that you stop deleting the accusation of sockpuppetry on [[1]] or you might get a ban foor 3RR violation. I think it would be better for you to raise questions about it being harresment elsewere.Slatersteven (talk) 13:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Raised at ANI, but I will continue to remove it. Let them block me, at least then an admin will look at the harassment by Noloop. I really dont care anymore, I am probably done with Wikipedia for the time being after being called a cockroach, a psychopath, a sockpuppet, a sick puppy and whatever else here. Pantherskin (talk) 14:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will miss you. And I don't see why people make unnessecary accusations.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 15:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is why. Whilst others seem to enjoy virtual immunity.16:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Slatersteven (talk)

Your Stalking, Trolling

Courtesy notice: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Trolls_of_Anti-Americanism —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noloop (talkcontribs) 19:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back'Slatersteven (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, couldnt believe what Noloop posted here. Noloop accusing others of stalking, trolling? Seriously? Pantherskin (talk) 19:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you believe this? Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 19:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noloop RFC

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/NoloopAbce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case (Noloop)

An arbitration case involving User:Noloop has been opened. I noticed that you placed a sockpuppet tag on his userpage on 12 August. The sockpuppet investigation page is here. Would you be able to present evidence at the case pages about this? I am asking the checkusers and clerks to add evidence as well. Carcharoth (talk) 19:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey Pantherskin, I believe from your comments in the EEML case pages that you are Georgian? Not that there's anything wrong with that :) If the answer is affirmative, would you mind translating something into Georgian for me? It's a few sentences only. Would appreciate help with this. Cheers, --Russavia Dialogue 19:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Banjeboi 18:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming bad faith on your part would probably be the most flattering option. Pantherskin (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, actually, we extend good faith to all editors. I'm assuming your disputing this content and source and have asked for others to help see the best way forward. The results of which should stay with the article for future editors to see why some decisions were made. I was restoring sourced content that had been removed without explanation and you accused me of purposely damaging the encyclopedia by perpetuating a hoax with no evidence the information is untrue or that I was purposely hoaxing anything. As a suggestion, make it clear next time why you are removing something and make a path for dialog. -- Banjeboi 20:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As a suggestion to you, think before you edit an article. Pantherskin (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom clerk warning

You have recently engaged in a series of posts on ArbCom pages which were deliberately inflammatory and breached the specific guidelines on user conduct handed down by ArbCom concerning the EEML case. You are thus receiving a first and final warning. Any further misconduct will result in a ban from the relevant ArbCom pages until the conclusion of the EEML case. Violation of that ban will result in blocking. Manning (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]