User talk:J Milburn: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:J Milburn/archive28. (BOT) |
→Renderings: I don't mean "add a note" as on commons, I mean in-image labels as in other featured diagrams |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
::I have [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Tuna_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29|posted]], just as how editors feel. --[[User:Extra999|Extra999]] ([[User talk:Extra999|Contact <sup>me</sup>]] + [[Special:Contributions/Extra999|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 16:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |
::I have [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Tuna_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29|posted]], just as how editors feel. --[[User:Extra999|Extra999]] ([[User talk:Extra999|Contact <sup>me</sup>]] + [[Special:Contributions/Extra999|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 16:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Renderings == |
|||
I'm a bit worried about your comment here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_picture_candidates%2FRQ-170_Sentinel&action=historysubmit&diff=356953679&oldid=356862993]. Do you mean to suggest that a labelled rendering would not be a diagram? Or not featurable? Thanks for clarifying. [[User:Papa Lima Whiskey|<font color="#ba0000">Papa Lima Whiskey</font>]] ([[User talk:Papa Lima Whiskey|talk]]) 19:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:44, 19 April 2010
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Thanks for dropping by! Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page. Messages here will often be read by a number of people. If you would rather discuss an issue privately, you can email me. I typically reply here, and, if I do, I will typically tag you in the message. If I haven't gotten back to you in a week and/or haven't gotten to something I said would, feel free to leave a reminder.
Removal of sections from talk:2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash
MickMacNee (talk · contribs) has removed two sections from the talk page of the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash, claiming WP:NOTFORUM as a reason for the removal. I'm not sure whether this was a good edit or not. Whilst I agree that the talk page is not a forum, I think that on balance it may have been better to leave those sections in. Would you mind taking a look at the edit. I'm not looking to sanction MMN over the edit either case, just a review of the edit and maybe a reversal if it is felt that such reversal would be in order. If you feel the edits were fine then I don't have a problem with them either. Mjroots (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I wanted a second opinion rather than getting into an argument with MMN over removal/reinstatement of the sections. He can be a pretty awkward person to deal with at times. Mjroots (talk) 12:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Wikicup
So people start with 0 points when a new round starts? I entered late without time to plan a strategy so I am participating for fun, not to win. However, I would like to qualify for round 3. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Someone accused me of being a sock but I was cleared by the checkuser. The sock was a contestant to wikicup. Really illogical! Spreading points among 2 usernames is a way to lose Wikicup. It would be more logical for 2 people to share a username in order to win wikicup. The sock accusation left a bad taste which means fewer edits to Wikipedia. I wish there were fewer troublemakers in Wikipedia and just editors editing/contributing. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Reviewers Award | ||
Take this --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 10:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |
Please see here. Unlimited, continuous chain of reverts. Please block it to level that only auto-confirmed user can edit it. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 15:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. But i feel it's already out. to registered level would be better --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 16:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- I have posted, just as how editors feel. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 16:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Renderings
I'm a bit worried about your comment here [1]. Do you mean to suggest that a labelled rendering would not be a diagram? Or not featurable? Thanks for clarifying. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)