User talk:Flipperwill: Difference between revisions
m →George Soros: missed s |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
We're ''all'' Wikipedia editors (users) here. Wikipedia has perhaps four or five paid employees that deal with technical/administrative issues, not article issues. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 14:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
We're ''all'' Wikipedia editors (users) here. Wikipedia has perhaps four or five paid employees that deal with technical/administrative issues, not article issues. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 14:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
Please read [[WP:VANDTYPES]] to see what is considered vandalism. Good faith edits to ensure articles comply with policy (especially [[WP:BLP]]'s) are definitely not vandalism. Repeatedly adding text without what Wikipedia considers proper sourcing will only get you blocked. And can you please stop adding spaces to the beginning of your sentences? It messes up formatting. Thanks. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 14:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== May 2010 == |
== May 2010 == |
||
Revision as of 14:39, 19 May 2010
I've removed the section you added per our WP:BLP policy: "Exercise caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts, other court records, or other public documents to support assertions about a living person, unless a reliable secondary source has published the material. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source..." --NeilN talk to me 13:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Court documents cannot be used per the policy above. We have strict rules on this. And I have no personal interest in the article beyond making sure any edits comply with Wikipedia policies. --NeilN talk to me 13:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
We're all Wikipedia editors (users) here. Wikipedia has perhaps four or five paid employees that deal with technical/administrative issues, not article issues. --NeilN talk to me 14:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Please read WP:VANDTYPES to see what is considered vandalism. Good faith edits to ensure articles comply with policy (especially WP:BLP's) are definitely not vandalism. Repeatedly adding text without what Wikipedia considers proper sourcing will only get you blocked. And can you please stop adding spaces to the beginning of your sentences? It messes up formatting. Thanks. --NeilN talk to me 14:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on George Soros. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me 13:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)