Jump to content

User talk:Tyrol5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
stop removing talk page comments
m Reverted edits by 69.181.249.92 (talk) to last revision by Minna Sora no Shita (HG)
Line 106: Line 106:


Thanks for the feedback - Hopefully more people will view it and take what it says on-board. I'm not sure it could ever be policy due to there being individuals whom would not like a restriction on the rationale that can be used, but it could certainly be a guideline (a bit like [[WP:IAR]] and [[WP:BOLD]] are). [[User:Esteffect|Esteffect]] ([[User talk:Esteffect|talk]]) 19:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback - Hopefully more people will view it and take what it says on-board. I'm not sure it could ever be policy due to there being individuals whom would not like a restriction on the rationale that can be used, but it could certainly be a guideline (a bit like [[WP:IAR]] and [[WP:BOLD]] are). [[User:Esteffect|Esteffect]] ([[User talk:Esteffect|talk]]) 19:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

== More warnings? ==
Why is asking a question considered vandalism? [[Special:Contributions/69.181.249.92|69.181.249.92]] ([[User talk:69.181.249.92|talk]]) 19:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:26, 20 August 2010


Thanks

For this. I hope I shan't have the chance to reciprocate. Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 21:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome!

You are more then welcome of course - always glad to aid a fellow patrol who does his job so well that he becomes a target himself :) Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging a user page as spam is NOT vandalism, especially given this editors history of inappropriate user page edits. Kindly remove the warning from my talk page. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although this edit may be arguably not vandalism, It looked like a personal attack on the user (which is unacceptable, no matter how bad the user may be). The page also does not fall under the csd set for user pages. Tyrol5 [Talk] 22:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it falls under the general csd set as a page that is primary to promote something, in this case his book. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC) PS - And my edit completely fails to qualify as vandalism since it's intent was not to deliberately compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This was not executed properly. You should have approached the user on their talk page before blatantly marking it for csd. Tyrol5 [Talk] 22:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of your opinions on execution, it was and is not vandalism and I ask again that you remove the warning from my talk page. I'll leave their latest feeble attempt to promote their opinions in place since it seems to matter so much to you. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Although it may not be vandalism, please be careful about these things in the future. They could easily be mistaken for personal attacks, which is indeed vandalism. Tyrol5 [Talk] 22:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Duly noted. If I hadn't gone 'round and 'round with this editor and their obvious disregard for UTP guidelines I wouldn't have even bothered. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expalnation please

Explain your meanness MR! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.253.16.46 (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

but i like this site... :( [[Image:CatDog.jpeg]]

Last edit was better yes? 71.253.16.46 (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why

do you keep blockings? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.0.252.152 (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

cool thanks cya —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.150.117 (talk) 17:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I hereby award you, Tyrol5, the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar, for your amazing work fighting vandalism. You've beaten me many times. Keep it up! :) --Meaghan :) 18:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Political Opinion

Hi there! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.154.124 (talk) 18:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry about that, buddy. Won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.154.124 (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ACC confirmation

I confirm my request for access to the ACC interface. Tyrol5 [Talk] 15:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Tyrol5, You've just declined my redirect text "Parvaz Homay". This is not a new text but the french version of that which already exists in English and Persian. Would you please tell me how I can add this translation to Wiki?

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.242.99 (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article exists on this wiki. I rejected the request as there did not appear to be any proof that the subject's name was commonly spelled with a hyphen (-). Tyrol5 [Talk] 04:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But I had writen "Parvaz Homay" without hyphen before and your colegue rejected it. I don't andrestand what can I write for the title. It has to be deffrent from the english version? How can I add a link "français" in language bar?

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.242.99 (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you might be looking to do is create an article on the French Wikipedia. Tyrol5 [Talk] 05:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! Tyrol5 [Talk] 18:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks from me too! You were even kind enough to update the vandal count for me :p Modest Genius talk 21:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome! Tyrol5 [Talk] 21:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CCP's cover of the single

Hi, I tried, but probably didn't enter correct information... What am I supposed to enter in, please? Benuliak 17:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuliak (talkcontribs)

I got it!! No need to reply. Thank u heaps anyway Benuliak 17:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuliak (talkcontribs)

You're welcome

Great job on Huggle too by the way- excellent work. Tommy! [message] 00:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your essay

Thanks for the feedback - Hopefully more people will view it and take what it says on-board. I'm not sure it could ever be policy due to there being individuals whom would not like a restriction on the rationale that can be used, but it could certainly be a guideline (a bit like WP:IAR and WP:BOLD are). Esteffect (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]